Answer:
The volume of the sphere is 14m³
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Volume of the cylinder = 
Required
Volume of the sphere
Given that the volume of the cylinder is 21, the first step is to solve for the radius of the cylinder;
<em>Using the volume formula of a cylinder</em>
The formula goes thus
Substitute 21 for V; this gives
Divide both sides by h
The next step is to solve for the volume of the sphere using the following formula;
Divide both sides by r
Expand Expression
Substitute
Multiply both sided by r
------ equation 1
From the question, we were given that the height of the cylinder and the sphere have equal value;
This implies that the height of the cylinder equals the diameter of the sphere. In other words
, where D represents diameter of the sphere
Recall that 
So, 
Substitute 2r for h in equation 1
Hence, the volume of the sphere is 14m³
Outcome Bag of Gold Magic Wand
Relative frequency 0.32 0.68
The relative frequency of getting a bag of gold is .......... reasonably close
.32 is close to 30% so
Alison's claim about the theoretical probability is likely to be 2............true
Further, this means that the theoretical probability of getting a magic wand is most likely 3............1 - 30% = 70%
It took the plane 1700 seconds for the plane to land. If you look at the x-axis, you can see that the x-intercept crosses through the point (0, 1700).
Try to relax. Your desperation has surely progressed to the point where
you're unable to think clearly, and to agonize over it any further would only
cause you more pain and frustration.
I've never seen this kind of problem before. But I arrived here in a calm state,
having just finished my dinner and spent a few minutes rubbing my dogs, and
I believe I've been able to crack the case.
Consider this: (2)^a negative power = (1/2)^the same power but positive.
So:
Whatever power (2) must be raised to, in order to reach some number 'N',
the same number 'N' can be reached by raising (1/2) to the same power
but negative.
What I just said in that paragraph was: log₂ of(N) = <em>- </em>log(base 1/2) of (N) .
I think that's the big breakthrough here.
The rest is just turning the crank.
Now let's look at the problem:
log₂(x-1) + log(base 1/2) (x-2) = log₂(x)
Subtract log₂(x) from each side:
log₂(x-1) - log₂(x) + log(base 1/2) (x-2) = 0
Subtract log(base 1/2) (x-2) from each side:
log₂(x-1) - log₂(x) = - log(base 1/2) (x-2) Notice the negative on the right.
The left side is the same as log₂[ (x-1)/x ]
==> The right side is the same as +log₂(x-2)
Now you have: log₂[ (x-1)/x ] = +log₂(x-2)
And that ugly [ log to the base of 1/2 ] is gone.
Take the antilog of each side:
(x-1)/x = x-2
Multiply each side by 'x' : x - 1 = x² - 2x
Subtract (x-1) from each side:
x² - 2x - (x-1) = 0
x² - 3x + 1 = 0
Using the quadratic equation, the solutions to that are
x = 2.618
and
x = 0.382 .
I think you have to say that <em>x=2.618</em> is the solution to the original
log problem, and 0.382 has to be discarded, because there's an
(x-2) in the original problem, and (0.382 - 2) is negative, and
there's no such thing as the log of a negative number.
There,now. Doesn't that feel better.
The price of the stock is below its starting price because the price will decrease before it increases
