Answer: Informed Consent
Explanation: The principle of Informed Consent stipulates that the participants of a research or study should be provided with enough information about the resarch so that they can make well informed decisios to take part in it.
Participants should be made to understand the potential risks and benefits of participation and should be allowed to take part willinging without force or coercion.
It should be argued that Dr. Schaeffer's research violates this ethical principle of research by not informing the students about the contignecy and intending risk (subtraction of 10 points) involved in his research.
Not gonna answer fully as if I were answering the question, but here are some ideas that might help.
1. I think it can do a bit of both. I’d like to say it does more good but I can see how it could create tension still.
2. For this one change needs to be talked about. This is probably a bad comparison but would the fridge ever get cleaned if you never told the person with that job to do so?
3. Up to you, I get where the question is going but still unclearish
Explanation:
Equal right to vote...........
