We need to notice that SSSS does not exist as a method to prove that parallelograms are congruent
Counterexample
As we can see we have the same measure of the side of the intern angles of the figures are different therefore we can't use SSSS to prove congruence
Answer:
A rational number.
Step-by-step explanation
A rational number is a ratio of whole numbers.
1/3 is the ratio of 1:3
3:1 becomes 3/1 = 3
32:10 can be written 32/10 or 16/5 or 3.2
16/5 is a rational number 16 and 5 are integers, 5 is not equal to 0.
Therefore, 3.2 which can be expressed as 16/5 is a rational number.
Answer:
<h2><u><em>
Area = x² + 8x + 12</em></u></h2><h2><u><em>
Perimeter = 4x + 16</em></u></h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
The area of a rectangle is given by the formula:
Area=width×height
The perimeter of a rectangle is given by the formula
Perimeter=2(width+height)
Area
(x + 6) × (x+2) =
x² + 2x + 6x + 12
x² + 8x + 12
------------------
Perimeter
2 × (x + 6 + x + 2) =
2 × (2x + 8) =
4x + 16
Start with
We observe that both fractions are not defined if 
. So, we will assume 
.
We multiply both numerator and denominator of the first fraction by 3 and we sum the two fractions:
We multiply both sides by 
:
We move everything to one side and solve the quadratic equation:
We check the solution:
which is true
Answer:
hello!!!!
the answer is 280
im not really sure... read the description.... since i dont see a picture attached i dont know the figure shape which makes it difficult to guarantee the correct answer for you....
please read the explanation.. it always helps...
Step-by-step explanation:
okay im going to guess that the figure is a rectangular prism... if not please correct me
if so.... then...
2(10*5 + 10*6 + 5*6)= 280
