All categories

2 years ago

Help if yk thanks lol

Business

2 answers:

dimaraw [331]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

300

Explanation:

if she sells one mask ( gains $400 )

she is gonna need to buy stuff for another mask ( loses $100 )

and if you take 400 - 100 = 300, you will figure out that her profit is 300

kondor19780726 [428]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Nicole has profit $400 ....,.............

You might be interested in

Three employees of a hardware store damaged a tile floor while moving concrete pavers from their delivery truck to an outdoor pa

KiRa [710]

Answer:

The Business Auto Coverage Form in this case will cover for tile damages that occur due to accidents brought about during the transfer of property from a covered auto to the place where the property is finally delivered. The damages that occurred on the pavers will not be covered because of the care, custody, and/or control exclusion clause.

8 0

3 years ago

mel-nik [20]

Answer:A

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Which of the following is the least reliable resource for fraud statistics? a. Fraud perpetrators. b. FBI agencies. c. Health ag

Stells [14]

Answer:

The correct answer is A) Fraud perpetrators.

Explanation:

Being fraud a crime it is normal to think of certain attributes that make us determine some characteristics of criminals; Preconceived are: poor education, bad manners, and bad by nature. Scholars of criminal behavior have determined certain personality characteristics of the fraud perpetrator that are far from the stereotypes cited.

3 0

3 years ago

Assume that securitization combined with borrowing and irrational exuberance in Hyperville have driven up the value of existing

Mashcka [7]

Answer:

The financial securities would decline by $106.7

Explanation:

Given

Financial securities at a geometric rate= $128

Underlying Security Asset = $14

Decreased value of the underlying asset = $6

When there's a reduction of $6 in the underlying asset price, this means the securities value will also get a reduction by a ratio of 6.

Because of this, we'll only consider the financial securities because it increases at a geometric progression unlike underlying assets that increases by arithmetic progression.

First, the value of financial securities needs to be calculated using the following formula;.

Value of Financial Securities = Financial securities at a geometric rate ÷

Decreased value of the underlying asset

Value of Financial Securities = $128 ÷ 6

Value of Financial Securities = $21.3

Tthe decline value of the financial securities is calculated as follows:

Decline Value = Financial securities at a geometric rate - Value of Financial Securities

Decline Value = $128 - $21.3

Decline Value = $106.7

Hence, the financial securities would decline by $106.7

6 0

2 years ago

Two towns, each with three members, are deciding whether to put on a fireworks display to celebrate the new year. fireworks cost

Burka [1]

1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is 450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass the cost benefit analysis.

If the fireworks' cost is to be split equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would

We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.

2) Town of River Heights:

We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be bought.

However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.

Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.

3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.

Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.

The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers