The long run will see the supply curve of a completive firm changing to the b. portion of the marginal-cost curve that lies above the average-total-cost curve.
<h3>What is the long-run supply curve in a perfect competition?</h3>
In a perfect competition, a company will only produce goods and services at a level where the marginal cost curve is above the average total cost in the long run.
This means that the supply curve will be the marginal cost curve but only the portion of this curve that is above the long-run average total cost curve.
The reason for this is that in the long-run., all the costs in a perfectly competitive firm are considered variable and so they can afford to avoid supply mishaps in the short term.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
Find out more on the long-run supply curve at brainly.com/question/15869064
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is B.
Explanation:
Gross profit equals net sales minus cost of sales(Net sales- Cost of Sales).
Net sales = $325,000
Cost of Sales = $240,500
Therefore we have;
$325,000 - $240,500
=$84,500
Gross profit ratio is (Gross profit/net sales) x 100%
($84,500 x $325,000) x 100%
26%
<span>Cross-sell is the practice of selling or suggesting related or complementary products to a prospect or customer. Cross selling is one of the easiest and most effective methods of marketing.</span>
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
participant perceives deviations but unrelated to researcher
Explanation:
In the case when the study is designed in order to evaluate how an employee reaction for interrupt at the time when an employee attempt to answer his or her email. After various interruption, the design should represent that there is a the participant that perceives the deviation but it is not related to the researcher as the changes responses via participants attach with the deviations
Therefore as per the given situation, the above represent the answer
