1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grandymaker [24]
3 years ago
6

Which statement best compares transcription and translation?

Biology
2 answers:
maks197457 [2]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D)

Explanation:

borishaifa [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: A chain of amino acids linked by peptide bonds...

Explanation:

You might be interested in
This occurs to bodies of rock when one body of rock moves relative to another. qizlet
Sveta_85 [38]
Hey there :)

This is so-called Faulting.

In our Earth, we have sections of the crust. When the sections move relative to each other, faulting occurs. 

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do derived characteristics affect cladograms?
Inessa [10]

Answer:

The Impact of Evolution

Darwin changed everything. The publication of his work on The Origin of Species in 1859, threw the whole of biological science into a new paradigm, including the study of classification theory and the principles of taxonomy.

While using logic as the basis of their work, both Aristotle and Linnaeus had developed their classification schemes on taxonomic principles that were fundamentally arbitrary. Their groups, while logical, were not based on any obvious relationships of a biological nature. They were convenient groups that humans could quickly see, identify and use.

This was acceptable because (a) no one could think of anything better, and (b) most people at the time believed in the 'fixed species' concept in which organism had been created in their current form and could never change.

After Darwin it was realized that organisms could indeed change, and that all current forms of living things had arrived at that form by change and natural selection, the mechanism of evolution. Scientists began to construct phylogenies, lists or diagrams that showed the evolutionary paths taken by populations of organisms through many generations and over long periods of time.

These phylogenetic diagrams quickly started to look like trees, as it was realized that ancestral stocks occasionally broke up, branched and became two or more different species, which could later branch again and again. A phylogenetic tree was a bit like a family tree, showing who the nearest relatives were and who shared a common ancestor, and when.

Organisms were related to one another, and these relationships could form the basis of a new type of taxonomy; on based on evolutionary origin and evolutionary relatedness.

Explanation:

The Impact of Evolution

Darwin changed everything. The publication of his work on The Origin of Species in 1859, threw the whole of biological science into a new paradigm, including the study of classification theory and the principles of taxonomy.

While using logic as the basis of their work, both Aristotle and Linnaeus had developed their classification schemes on taxonomic principles that were fundamentally arbitrary. Their groups, while logical, were not based on any obvious relationships of a biological nature. They were convenient groups that humans could quickly see, identify and use.

This was acceptable because (a) no one could think of anything better, and (b) most people at the time believed in the 'fixed species' concept in which organism had been created in their current form and could never change.

After Darwin it was realized that organisms could indeed change, and that all current forms of living things had arrived at that form by change and natural selection, the mechanism of evolution. Scientists began to construct phylogenies, lists or diagrams that showed the evolutionary paths taken by populations of organisms through many generations and over long periods of time.

These phylogenetic diagrams quickly started to look like trees, as it was realized that ancestral stocks occasionally broke up, branched and became two or more different species, which could later branch again and again. A phylogenetic tree was a bit like a family tree, showing who the nearest relatives were and who shared a common ancestor, and when.

Organisms were related to one another, and these relationships could form the basis of a new type of taxonomy; on based on evolutionary origin and evolutionary relatedness.

7 0
3 years ago
Which phrase best describes what a soil horizon is? Question 3 options: the bottom layer of a soil profile each layer of a soil
IRINA_888 [86]
The place where two soil profiles meet i believe!
3 0
3 years ago
In 1985 a biologist counted 750 pine trees in a 250 hectare forest. Using similar counting techniques, the biologist counted 1,2
Alisiya [41]

Answer:

Suppose that we have a given function f(x)

The average rate of change of the function between two values x₁ and x₂ is given by:

r = \frac{f(x_2) - f(x_1)}{x_2 - x_1}

a) We want to find the average (rate) of change on the size of population from 1985 to 1995.

We have that:

f(1985) = 750

f(1995) = 1500

Then we have:

r = \frac{1500 - 750}{1995 - 1985}  = 750/10 = 75

This means that the population of trees increases, in average, at a rate of 75 trees per year.

b) What is the density of trees each year that they were counted?

This will be equal to the quotient between the number of trees and the area.

1985: number of trees = 750 pines

         area = 250 ha

Then the density is:

D(1985) = (750 pines)/(250 ha) = 3 pines/ha

So 1985, there were 3 pines per hectare.

1990: number of trees = 1250 pines

         area = 250 ha

Then the density is:

D(1990) = (1250 pines)/(250 ha) = 5 pines/ha

1995: number of trees = 1500 pines

         area = 250 ha

The density is:

D(1995) = (1500 pines)/(250 ha) = 6 pines/ha

3) now we want to get the average change between 1985 and 1995 in the density, this will be:

r = \frac{D(1995) - D(1885)}{1995 - 1985}  = \frac{6 pines/ha - 3pines/ha}{10}  = 0.3 pines/ha

So, on average, each year the number of pines per hectare increases by 0.3

7 0
3 years ago
Color-blindness is a x-linked recessive disease. Under what circumstances will this condition manifest in a child? (2 points)
Lera25 [3.4K]
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the first option. The circumstances that this condition would manifest would be if  the child is a male and its mother has the recessive allele. X-linked recessive inheritance<span> is a mode of </span>inheritance<span> in which a </span>mutation<span> in a </span>gene<span> on the </span>X chromosome<span> causes the phenotype to be expressed in males </span><span>and in females who are homozygous for the gene mutation</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Where is chicken pox most common??
    5·2 answers
  • If the pressure acting on a gas is reduced, what will happen to the volume at a constant temperature?
    8·1 answer
  • The first plants to colonize land were the:
    8·1 answer
  • Which fossils were found in both Africa and South America?
    11·1 answer
  • In ____
    9·1 answer
  • NEED HELP DUE TODAY PLZ HELP ME!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following substances is neutral?
    12·1 answer
  • How do plants recycle carbon during photosynthesis
    8·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE
    7·2 answers
  • What happens to a limestone over time
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!