Answer:
The correct answer is option b.
Explanation:
In an open economy, domestic firms have to face competition from the foreign producers. If firms face losses in the long run, because of import competition, these firms will leave the industry.
As the number of domestic firms get reduced, the demand curve of the other firms will become flatter. This happens because of the foreign firms that bring in a large variety of goods in the domestic market.
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer:
0.31
Explanation:
Income elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in income
Income elasticity of demand = percentage change in quantity demanded / percentage change in income
Percentage change in income = 
= 2.3
when income was $300, ramen was demanded twice, that is 2/7 times a week. converting to fraction gives 0.29
Percentage change in quantity = 
= 0.72
0.72/2.3 = 0.31
Answer:
The reason for a civil law suit can be almost any harm or wrongful act done to an individual or business, by another person or business entity. For example, a breach of most contracts can be considered as the reason for a civil law suit. Also, car accidents and misfortunes take a big share in civil law suits.
If a defendant loses in a civil law suit, he usually pays in dollars, as reimbursement for the harm done. Rarely, this results in actual time in prison (behind bars).
----------------------------------------------------------------
Usually, when harm or potential misunderstanding includes someone you know or work with, the first step is to try to settle things without court. Legal costs can become overwhelming, especially if the problem could be solved beforehand.
Also, the social and relationship aspect is extremely important. If you take a case to the court (especially if the reason is minor and could be potentially settled without the aid of legal entities), the relationship between you and the defendant will always have a hostile notion to it. That is a factor to take into consideration if the defendant is an acquaintance or co-worker.
Here is the answer: Too much oil added for amount of continuous phase (liquid)• Over-mixed• Product became too hot<span>• Not enough stabilizer in recipe</span>
