Answer:
$10,200
Explanation:
The computation of the deferred income tax expense or benefit is shown below:
Favorable temporary difference = $50,000
Less: Unfavorable temporary difference -$20,000
Net favorable temporary difference $30,000
We assume the tax rate is of 34%
So, the deferred tax expense is
= $30,000 × 34%
= $10,200
By finding out the net favorable temporary difference and then multiplied with the tax rate we can get the deferred tax expense and the same is shown above
Answer:
The board most likely will not be held responsible.
Explanation:
The board of directors can legally defend themselves based on the Business Judgement Rule. This rule in contained in the <u>Corporations Act of 2001 - Section 180.</u> It states that any decision made in regards to the business operations should be:
- In good faith and not based on personal gain
- In the best interest of the corporation
- Based on information that supports the decision
For this particular case, the board based their decision on <em>previous market research</em> that received positive feedback.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
if you refuse to tell others the problem then you risk everything
Answer:
Violated employees personal compact.
Explanation:
The manager at Seasons Hotel wanted to change the incentive system to offer bonuses tied to the hotel's financial performance, but the employees refused to comply. This example shows that the manager has violated employees personal compact which is defined as the formal, social and psychological aspects of the relationships between the workers and the organization. It is termed as the mutual commitments and obligations which are stated and implied between the employer and the employee. Here, the manager has broken and violated that implicitly set rules when he has tried to tie the incentive system with the financial performance of the Hotel which workers can think that will be difficult to get if the Hotel doesn't not perform well.
