I think the statement given above is false. The variable used to predict changes in the values of another value is not called the response variable. The variable used to predict another variable is called the independent, <span>predictor or </span><span>explanatory variable. Hope this answers the question.</span>
I wonder if you mean to write ![\sqrt[3]{256}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B256%7D)
in place of 
...
If you meant what you wrote, then we have
If you meant to write (the cube root of 256), then we could go on to have
![\sqrt[3]{256}=\sqrt[3]{16^2}=\sqrt[3]{(4^2)^2}=\sqrt[3]{4^4}=\sqrt[3]{4^3\cdot4}=4\sqrt[3]4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B256%7D%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B16%5E2%7D%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%284%5E2%29%5E2%7D%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B4%5E4%7D%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B4%5E3%5Ccdot4%7D%3D4%5Csqrt%5B3%5D4)
Answer:
1 and 17/25
Step-by-step explanation:
First, you make it into a fraction. So because percents are out of 100, it would be 168/100. Then, you take 100 out of it to get a mixed number, 1 and 68/100, and then simplify 68/100 by dividing both sides by the greatest common factor, which is 4. 68/100÷4=17/25. The answer would be 1 and 17/25.
(hope this helps :P)
Answer:
2970
Step-by-step explanation:
2700+ 270
270 because that is 10% of 2700
2700 because that is 75 x 36
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Solve the inequality 5x − 4y > 20 for y, as follows: Subtract 5x from both sides, obtaining:
-4y > 20 - 5x;
Then divide all terms by -4:
y < -5 +(5/4)x, where the direction of the inequality sign has been reversed because of division by a negative quantity.
Temporarily replace the < symbol with = obtaining y = -5 +(5/4)x. Now choose at least three x values and find the corresponding y values. For example:
x y = -5 +(5/4)x
0 -5
4 0
-8 -15
Now plot these three points (0, -5), (4, 0) and (-8, -15). Draw a dashed line through them. Because of the < symbol in y < -5 +(5/4)x, shade the area underneath the dashed line.
