Answer:
x = 4 ± 
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
(x - 12)(x + 4) = 9 ← expand the left side using FOIL
x² - 8x - 48 = 9 ( ad 48 to both sides )
x² - 8x = 57
To complete the square
add ( half the coefficient of the x- term )² to both sides
x² + 2(- 4)x + 16 = 57 + 16
(x - 4)² = 73 ( take the square root of both sides )
x - 4 = ±
( add 4 to both sides )
x = 4 ± 
Answer:
You can find and write the equations in Slope-Intercept form due to the slope and y-intercept.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Slope-Intercept Form Formula: y=mx+b
The m represents the slope while the b represents the y-intercept
You can also use y2 - y1 / x2 - x1 to find the slope which is the m in your formula.
Lastly, to find a y-intercept, you can plug in your coordinate for the x and y to do two-step linear equations.
The probability of rolling a 2 is 1/6. If X is a random variable representing the number of 2s that are obtained after rolling a die 23 times, then X follows a binomial distribution with success probability p = 1/6 across n = 23 trials.
The variance of a binomial distribution with parameters p and n is n p (1 - p), so the standard deviation in this case would be
√(23 • 1/6 • 5/6) ≈ 1.8
Answer: 37, 38, and 39
Step-by-step explanation: This problem states that the sum of 3 consecutive integers is 114 and it asks us to find the integers.
3 consecutive integers can be represented as followed.
X ⇒ <em>first integer</em>
X + 1 ⇒ <em>second integer</em>
X + 2 ⇒ <em>third integer</em>
<em />
Since the sum of our 3 consecutive integers is 114, we can set up an equation to represent this.
X + X + 1 + X + 2 = 114
We can simplify on the left side by combining the X's and the numbers.
3x + 3 = 114
-3 -3 ← <em>subtract 3 from both sides of the equation</em>
3x = 111
÷3 ÷3 ← <em>divide both sides of the equation by 3</em>
<em> </em>X = 37
X ⇒ <em>first integer = 37</em>
X + 1 ⇒ <em>second integer = 38</em>
X + 2 ⇒ <em>third integer = 39</em>
<em />
<em>Therefore, our 3 consecutive integers are 37, 38, and 39.</em>
Answer:
no
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct explanation is A
= 
Thus
× 
= 2.3 × 
= 2.3 × 