All categories

3 years ago

HELP ME OUT PLEASE!!!

Mathematics

2 answers:

Vikki [24]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

So the scale factor would be the length of the new rectangle divided by the length of the corresponding side for the original rectangle. So the scale factor is 1/2. Note: If you're going from a bigger shape to a smaller one, you know that the scale factor must be less than 1.

Step-by-step explanation:

otez555 [7]3 years ago

5 0

ANSWER:

STEP BY STEP EXPLANATION:

You might be interested in

PLEASE HELPPPPP

Flauer [41]

Answer:

Cost of 1 rose bush = x = $5

Cost of 1 geraniums = y = $2

Step-by-step explanation:

DeShawn and Mike each improved their yards by planting rose bushes and geraniums. They bought their supplies from the same store.

Let us represent:

Cost of 1 rose bush = x

Cost of 1 geraniums = y

DeShawn spent $13 on 1 rose bush and 4 geraniums.

x + 4y = 13..... Equation 1

x = 13 - 4y

Mike spent $56 on 10 rose bushes and 3 geraniums.

10x + 3y = 56....... Equation 2

We substitute 13 - 4y for x in Equation 2

10(13 - 4y) + 3y = 56

130 - 40y + 3y = 56

Collect like terms

- 40y + 3y = 56 - 130

-37y = -74

y = -74/37

y = $2

Solving for x

x = 13 - 4y

x = _13 - 4 × $2

x = $13 - $8

x = $5

Therefore,

Cost of 1 rose bush = x = $5

Cost of 1 geraniums = y = $2

7 0

3 years ago

Can someone please help me with 7-

Helga [31]

Answer:

The answer is the second one , 0=5 , no solutions .

Step-by-step explanation:

Good luck

5 0

3 years ago

Please help !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br><br><br><br>what is A

algol13

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a=11/12

7 0

3 years ago

-3432

avanturin [10]

Answer:

ʍouʞ ʇ,uop ᴉ ʇnq ʎɹɹos ɯ,ᴉ

7 0

3 years ago

Silicon wafers are scored and then broken into the many small microchips that will he mounted into circuits. Two breaking method

antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

The estimate is $- 0.0265\le K \le 0.0465$

Method B this is because the faulty breaks are less

Step-by-step explanation:

The number of microchips broken in method A is $n_1 = 400$

The number of faulty breaks of method A is $X_1 = 32$

The number of microchips broken in method B is $n_2 = 400$

The number of faulty breaks of method A is $X_2 = 32$

The proportion of the faulty breaks to the total breaks in method A is

$p_1 = \frac{32}{400}$

$p_1 = 0.08$

The proportion of the faulty to the total breaks in method B is

$p_2 = \frac{28}{400}$

$p_2 = 0.07$

For this estimation the standard error is

$SE = \sqrt{ \frac{p_1 (1 - p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{p_2 (1- p_2 )}{n_2} } }$

substituting values

$SE = \sqrt{ \frac{0.08 (1 - 0.08)}{400} + \frac{0.07 (1- 0.07 )}{400} } }$

$SE = 0.0186$

The z-values of confidence coefficient of 0.95 from the z-table is

$z_{0.95} = 1.96$

The difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is mathematically represented as

$K = [p_1 - p_2 ] \pm z_{0.95} * SE$

substituting values

$K = [0.08 - 0.07 ] \pm 1.96 *0.0186$

$K = - 0.0265 \ or \ K = 0.0465$

The interval of the difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is

$- 0.0265\le K \le 0.0465$

3 0

3 years ago