Answer:
Raju = 17 years
Raju's father age = 46 years
Raju's grandfather age = 72 years
Raju's grandmother = 68 years
His sister = 10 years old
Step-by-step explanation:
Raju’s father is 26 years younger than Raju’s grandfather and 29 years older than Raju. The sum of the ages of all the three is 135 years. Also, Raju's Grandmother is four times of Raju’s age and his sister is 7 years younger than him.
Let
Raju's age = x
Raju's father age = x + 29
Raju's grandfather age = (x + 29) + 26
Total ages = 135
(x) + (x + 29) + (x + 29) + 26 = 135
x + x + 29 + x + 29 + 26 = 135
3x + 84 = 135
3x = 135 - 84
3x = 51
x = 51 /3
x = 17
Raju's age = x = 17 years
Raju's grandmother = 4 times raju's age
= 4 × 17 years
= 68 years
his sister = 7 years younger than him.
= 17 - 7
= 10 years old
Raju's father age = x + 29
= 17 + 29
= 46 years
Raju's grandfather age = (x + 29) + 26
= 46 + 26
= 72 years
The answer that I got when doing the calculations is A=70.
The graph (by some miracle) has been uploaded for you. It is just about the first time I've done this sort of thing, and I've answered nearly 800 questions.
The first thing you have to do is study the graph. The two functions are
f(x) = 4^x That's the curved graph. (in red)
g(x) = x + 4. That's the straight line. (in blue)
You know that the first one is not a linear relationship because the x values go from integer values -2 to 2 (including 0). The y values are a bit different. They go from 1/16 to 16 with those integer values. So you could try y = 4^(-x). It doesn't work, but you could try it. It gives the table numbers for y in the reverse order that the table you are given goes. For x you get -2 -1 0 1 2 and for y you would get 16 4 1 1/4 1/16.
You could try y = (1/4)^x
For this try, you would get x = -2 -1 0 1 2 and for y = 16 4 0 1/4 and 1/16
but that doesn't work either.
You could try until you get y = 4^x which does work.
g(x) is a lot easier to deal with. It looks better behaved. as x goes up, so does y. You will find that the y values obey y = x + 4. You could try other lines, but that one works. Many times it's just a guess
Answer:
80
Step-by-step explanation:
30 = 100
24 = 80
6 x 5 = 30
6 x 4 = 24
5 = 20 because 5 x 8 = 80.
RT = 8 , RS = 3 AND ST = 5.4
RV = 4 , RU = 1.5 AND UV = 2.7
∴ RT/RV = 8/4 = 2
AND RS/RU = 3/1.5 = 2
AND ST/UV = 5.4/2.7 = 2
∴Δ RTS IS SIMILAR TO ΔRVU
SO, the best statement is:
Each pair of sides corresponds with a common ratio of 2.