9514 1404 393
Answer:
a) see the attached spreadsheet (table)
b) Calculate, for a 10-year horizon; Computate for a longer horizon.
c) Year 13; no
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The attached table shows net income projections for the two companies. Calculate's increases by 0.5 million each year; Computate's increases by 15% each year. The result is rounded to the nearest dollar.
__
b) After year 4, Computate's net income is increasing by more than 0.5 million per year, so its growth is faster and getting faster yet. However, in the first 10 years, Calculate's net income remains higher than that of Computate. If we presume that some percentage of net income is returned to investors, then Calculate may provide a better return on investment.
The scenario given here is only interested in the first 10 years. However, beyond that time frame (see part C), we find that Computate's income growth far exceeds that of Calculate.
__
c) Extending the table through year 13, we see that Computate's net income exceeds Calculate's in that year. It continues to remain higher as long as the model remains valid.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
- 113.04, 4, 452.16
- 78.5, 11, 863.5
- 153.86, 10, 1538.6
Step-by-step explanation:
When calculations are repetitive, I like to let a calculator or spreadsheet do them. Here we have used the formula for the base area:
B = πr² = 3.14×r²
In the second figure, the radius is half the diameter, so is 5 units.
The table in the attachment lists the base area B, the height h (from the figures), and the volume V. These are the values that you need to drag and drop to the boxes in your problem.
V = 113.04 · 4
V = 452.16 units³ . . . showing how the numbers are used in the first figure
You can use photomath for this
Add 25 to both sides x-25 +25 =7 +25
x =32