Answer:
because it is
Explanation:
it is correct because the way people are
Answer and Explanation:
In an action based on strict liability, a plaintiff must show that
(1) a product was defective,
(2) the defendant was in the business of distributing the product,
(3) the product was unreasonably dangerous due to the defect,
(4) the plaintiff suffered harm,
(5) the defect was the proximate cause of the harm, and
(6) the goods were not substantially changed from the time they were sold.
A plaintiff does not have to show that there was a failure to exercise due care, and this distinguishes an action based on strict liability from an action based on negligence, which requires proof of a lack of due care. If Bob establishes his case, the court in this problem is most likely to rule in his favor, because the manufacturer is strictly liable in this case. Strict liability allows a plaintiff to recover damages for injuries resulting from product defects without proof of fault.
Answer part time,self employed,entry level
Explanation:
increase the output by one-unit so it will increase the firm's profit.
Answer:
b. 10.426%
Explanation:
Using the attached formula, convert the nominal rate to effective annual rate
<em>m</em> in the formula is the number of compounding periods per year; 12/2 = 6 in this case.
APR is the nominal rate which is 10%.
Next, plug in the numbers to the formula as shown below;
EAR = ![[1+\frac{0.10}{6}]^{6} -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B1%2B%5Cfrac%7B0.10%7D%7B6%7D%5D%5E%7B6%7D%20-1)
EAR = 1.10426-1
EAR = 0.10426 or 10.426% as a percentage
Hence choice B is correct.
