Answer:
Inductive reasoning
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning refers to a specific type of logical thinking that involves forming generalizations based on specific incidents you've experienced or observations you've made. This specific incidents or observations make the person generalize thinking the whole should be similar to the specific part that the person has witnessed.
In this example, Bertha met two students from another school and was impressed with how nice they were. Bertha now believes that all of the students from that school must also be nice. <u>Bertha made an observation on two specific students of the school and now she is generalizing her observations thinking ALL the students from that school must be nice</u>. Thus, Bertha is using inductive reasoning.
Mostly its everything bit I think the specific one is oil.
Answer:
Option B. Not be approved because he has violated the ethical standard of confidentiality/privacy.
Explanation:
The ethical standard of confidentiality refers to protect the information that has been shared within the included group.
Under this, the one has a duty that the individual should not theft or pass on the information and data to the entity which has not been allowed to have access to the information.
Here the John has asked for the names of the participants which as an act that violates the ethical standard of confidentiality/privacy i.e he has acquired the data that has been provided so that the participant identity is private.
