Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
This affect the United States or Mexico through options B and D: US exporters would see an increase in demand in Mexico for their goods and consumers in the United States would be able to purchase more goods from Mexico for their money.
<h3>
How would this affect the United States or Mexico?</h3>
Value of the Mexican peso depreciates relative to the US dollar. This will make Mexican goods cheaper to the US residents because now they've to pay less USD to buy 1 unit of Mexican peso.
However, Mexicans will find US goods costlier than before because now they have to pay more pesos to buy 1 USD.
Therefore, demand for Mexican export will increase and the demand for US export will decrease.
Hence, correct answer is option B and D
Learn more about Mexico, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/13802568
#SPJ1
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The government does control the market economy they may also ensure national security by not allowing businesses to transact with enemy countries and providing services that are not typically handled by private business.