The central bank.
it is important, i wouldn’t necessarily say good.
no.
central banks, retail banks
Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
Answer:
transformational
Explanation:
According to my research on different styles of leadership, I can say that based on the information provided within the question it was transformational leadership that showed the highest overall relationships. This is because this style pertains to an individual who brings about positive, major changes in an organization, and focuses on the leader's personal characteristics and his/her relationship with group members.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Everything is more modern now.
