Answer:
Hindsight bias
Explanation:
Most individuals usually seem to perceive that they have a clearer picture or better knowledge of an event after such incident or happening has occurred, prompting then to think that they had a good knowledge of the occurrence before it occurred than they actually do.
For instance, after so many incidents, eyewitnesses or other individuals usually claim they knew what happened would actually occur. Owing to the fact that the incident has actually occurred, they say their claim with much more swagger than than they usually do before the incident.
I would say <span>C. Raising seafood through agriculture
If they raise their own fish, they wouldn't have to overfish from oceans. </span>
Answer:
<em>"It means corrective lenses are required."</em>
Explanation:
When a healthcare professional needs to give an answer to the client, this needs to be well-thought and objective, as the client is in a vulnerable position and can be get easily scared about a condition, that he or she doesn't know. There are different types of refraction errors and the healthcare professional can explain to the patient which kind he or she has, patiently and with a lot of tact, in the right moment. However, if the patient is asking for the severity of the problem, the best answer is direct, to tell them lenses will be needed.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": That the oral agreement fell outside the statute of frauds if the plaintiff satisfied the main-purpose doctrine.
Explanation:
<em>Power Entertainment Inc. </em>sued <em>National Football League Properties Inc.</em>(NFLP), saying the other party violated an oral agreement to allow it to assume a third party debt if the other party would allow it to acquire valuable third party business licenses previously held. The Court of Appeals ruled that fraud status did not apply in such cases in Texas, the state where it all took place.
Australia is the leading producer of bauxite
