Answer:
Maximum shear stress in region AB=1.04 MPa
Maximum shear stress in region BC=3.11 MPa
Explanation:
The explanation is attached in the attachments.
Answer:
C. strike-slip fault
Explanation:
The scientist must have observed a strike- slip fault.
A fault is an evidence of brittle deformation of the crust in the presence of applied stress on earth materials. Here, the earth material is the rock subjected to tension.
Where a fault occurs, there must have been movement between two blocks of rocks. The direction of movement helps us to delineate the fault type.
- When two blocks moves past each other horizontally, it is a strike-slip fault like rubbing your palms together.
- When a block moves in the direction of the dip, it forms a dip-slip fault which results in a fault-block mountain characterized by graben and horst systems.
Option A, Plateau is a table landform usually a mountain with flat peak.
Option B is a bowl shaped stratigraphic pattern in which the youngest sequence is at the core of the strata or a fold.
So, the most fitting option is C, a strike-slip fault.
Answer:
, repulsive
Explanation:
The magnitude of the electric force between two charged particles is given by Coulomb's law:
where:
is the Coulomb's constant
are the two charges of the two particles
r is the separation between the two charges
The force is:
- repulsive if the two charges have same sign
- Attractive if the two charges have opposite signs
In this problem, we have two electrons, so:
is the magnitude of the two electrons
is their separation
Substituting into the formula, we find the electric force between them:

And the force is repulsive, since the two electrons have same sign charge.
According to another source this is what I got
<span>0.735 J ( Ep-potential energy, m-mass,g-gravitational acceleration = 9.81m/s², h-height; Ep = m * g * h; Ep = 0.0300 kg * 9.81 m/s² * 2.5 m )
</span>Hope it helps
<span>The next step of the scientific method is to analyze the results and draw conclusions. After that step, if the results agree with the hypothesis, then the results should be communicated. If the results do not support the original hypothesis, then the biologist must go back to the beginning and reformulate their hypothesis based on the results of the experiment.</span>