Answer:
Let’s analyze this conflict from the perspective of a conservation biologist.
Explanation:
<u>Conservation biologist</u> knows the<em> value of all species naturally present in a given ecosystem and the need to maintain balance in numbers of each species. Thus, uncontrolled hunting of wild carnivores may lead to reduction in their number and ultimately endanger the given species of carnivores in a particular country</em>.
Meanwhile, conservation biologist understands that certain people perceive <em>commons</em>, as a shared resource system, in a different way. In particular, people with particular interest and needs (<u>farmers and ranchers</u>), affected by the natural functioning of this system. From their perspective, resources that do not belong to any other particular individual and which are considered to be common, can be neglected if they interfere with farmer business. If the commons are unregulated it can lead to a greater abuse, thus the 'tragedy of commons'.
I believe the answer is: Reason and Conscience.
According to James Rachel, morality is not created by a 'higher being' that gives order for humans in what we're supposed to do.
It's created by observing day to day human interactions and creating a standard on what each individuals should do so the society could collectively benefited from that standard.<span />
Answer:
a. publication bias
Explanation:
since he searched up "sick from taco bell", he's only going to see stories about getting sick from taco bell. he doesn't see any other points of view.
Abraham Lincoln was a man beloved by his people. He had abolished slavery, and with his death, people were uncertain. Who would be the next president? Would slavery be reinstated?
