1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natima [27]
2 years ago
5

I GOT 10 min Plsss help iApplying the Skill

History
1 answer:
Vilka [71]2 years ago
7 0
I think that Harriet Tubman was a great leader. She fought for slaves rights by sacrificing herself. Harriet protested by sitting by the white people on the bus when she should’ve been sitting by the back, with the other black people. So for that she started a rebellion where you don’t do violence, but protest for rights. So these are examples that show why Harriet Tubman is a great leader.

((PLS MARK BRAINLIEST)) ((oh and I hope that this helps!))
You might be interested in
8) Which nation has no political parties, no voting rights for its citizens, and is ruled by a king? A) Iran B) Iraq C) Saudi Ar
liberstina [14]

Answer:

C. Saudi Arabia.

Explanation:

Saudi Arabia is an hereditary, absolute monarchy. It´s ruled by the Al Saud family. The king is the head of state. The king performs executive, legislative and judicial functions. The monarchy is extremely powerful and citizens have very little rights. The political system is often critized by international human rights organizations for not granting all rights established by international conventions to its citizens.

4 0
3 years ago
Benefits and challenges that the Clergy class faced
nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

Pros :

You had the possibility to help people rather directly as there were more little towns.

People were much more receptive to your preaches. You had a rather large freedom of speech especially if you were a bishop. (This is not in middle ages but the priest that lead Louis XIV burial mass said in his preach “Only God is great !” (Implicitly saying that the king was a standart man that was confronted to the same necessity than other people).

You had access to a good education (and to some boos, what was rather scarce before the XVIth century) hence, you were one of the few litterate persons allowing you to teach people how to read and write. You could have an intellectual influence and a social influence by teaching the local lord’s children how to read and sometimes give political pieces of advice to the local lord.

You could yourself be a local lord as bishop / head of an abbey.

You could be the head of a local charity (origin of hospitals).

In France you didn’t pay taxes. On the contrary, you received one tenth of peasants’ crops.

If you were an eminent bishop / cardinal, or if you were the Pope you could have tremendous spiritual and political power.

You could get married while being a catholic priest (before the XIIth century, before 1123 precisely).

Cons :

You could be obliged to condemn people because they didn’t believe in God - help the Inquisition.

You had to help / discuss with people that were sentenced to death what should have been very difficult on a psychological point of view.

You couldn’t get married after the XIIth century (after 1123).

You could be seen with envy considering your privileges.

Explanation:

found it online

8 0
2 years ago
What basic principle of mercantilism was disproved by Adam Smith in his book, The Wealth of Nations?
oee [108]
Scottish philosopher who wrote The Wealth of Nations in 1776. Argued that money in and of itself did not constitute wealth wealth but merely its marker. He advocated Laissez-faire economic theory. Adam Smith also said that individuals should freely pursue their own economic interests
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Choose the correct order of events for the items below.
Ksivusya [100]
First, second, third
5 0
2 years ago
Why did some new European govern-<br> ments survive and others fail during<br> the 1920s?
tangare [24]

Economic depression make many democracies became weak and they became threatened for the communism and dictators.

The 1929 Crisis was a consequence of the great expansion of credit through money supply (issuance of money and bonds) carried out by the Federal Reserve System (a type of US Central Bank) since the early years of the 1920s. from 1929, this expansion had to be stopped by the Government, since the adjustment of accounts needed to be done. The Government then stopped expanding the money supply and began to operate a loan restriction policy. Fearing the currency's devaluation, many people and companies withdrew their reserves from banks, initiating a recessionary process.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was not a pre-Aztec mesoamerican civilization a. the Inuit b. the olmecs c. the Toltecs d. the Maya
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following are the most numerous in North America 
    8·1 answer
  • What fate did Benjamin Franklin fear if the colonist did not unite to repel the french and indians?
    12·2 answers
  • What changes were made to religious laws during the Glorious Revolution?
    5·1 answer
  • What work rules were authorized by the Fair Labor Standards Act?
    9·1 answer
  • A reason the some goods were scare during world war 2 was that the war
    5·1 answer
  • What new, stealthy warship of the German High Seas Fleet was responsible for sinking many Allied ships during the war?
    11·2 answers
  • Which country or region experienced the largest increase in total wheat acreage?
    15·1 answer
  • Como hubiésemos comunicarnos en cuarentena si no hubiese existido el Internet
    7·2 answers
  • According to the passage, what was true about the Minutemen?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!