Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
Answer:
There are usually three ways that people react to change: Be non-active. Be reactive. Be proactive and positive
Explanation:
Answer:
COGNITIVE ACCESSIBILITY
Explanation:
current cognitive accessibility of a given person characteristic—that is, the extent to which a person characteristic quickly and easily comes to mind for the perceiver.
Tropical climate receives the most solar energy
"Do you think of the AMA as a labor union<span> or a price fixing group?"
</span>"The company care givers were using collective bargaining<span> to help satisfy the workers."
</span>Hope this helps!
~Jessica