Answer is in a photo. I can only upload it to a file hosting service. link below!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca470/ca47036009df5ef5fa53595fb4dca72edd84ffda" alt="bit.^{}ly/3dXyuz8"
Answer:
The Draper Corporation would be indifferent between continuing and discontinuing of Doombugs at 20,000 units.
Explanation:
The draper should be indifferent at the level at which they covered all of their Fixed Cost.
The sales price per unit is ⇒ 150,000/15,000 = 10 per unit
The Variable cost per unit is ⇒ 120,000/15,000 = 8 per unit
The Break-even units for Draper should be:
Break-even units = <u> Fixed Cost </u>
Sale price - Variable Cost
Break-even units = <u>40,000</u>
10-8
Break-even units = <u>40,000</u>
2
Break-even units = 20,000 units
Answer:
- 1. Paid $38 for an oil change.
$38 Maintenance Expenses - DEBIT
$38 Cash - CREDIT
- 2. Paid $564 to install special shelving units, which increase the operating efficiency of the truck.
$564 Delivery Trucks - DEBIT
$564 Cash - CREDIT
Explanation:
1. Paid $38 for an oil change
$38 Maintenance Expenses - DEBIT
$38 Cash - CREDIT
An oil change it's just an expenses of maintenance, which goes as General Expenses directly to the Income Statement.
2. Paid $564 to install special shelving units, which increase the operating efficiency of the truck.
$564 Delivery Trucks - DEBIT
$564 Cash - CREDIT
The installations of shelving units it's an improvements in the company's fixed assets, therefore, assets improvements are activated as fixed assets in the non-current assets section of the balance sheets.
The option that would be considered the highest risk portfolio is a<span> portfolio made up of 60% stocks, 30% mutual funds, and 10% Treasury bonds.
There is a lot of risks when investing in anything, because you pay a lot of money for something that may not be a wise idea, because in the end, you may lose a lot more than you get.
</span>
Answer:
hedonic Theory of Wages:
Accept just two kinds of occupations in the work showcase (safe employments versus unsafe occupations). Under this, sheltered employments have likelihood of zero that specialist gets harmed. Unsafe occupations have likelihood of 1 and laborers know this. Laborers care about whether their occupations are sheltered or hazardous.
Laborers expand utility by picking wage-chance blends that offer them the best measure of utility. Expect laborers disdain hazard, yet to various degrees, for example they have diverse ideal pay chance blends. Firms are on their isoprofit bends that give the hazard wage mixes that give zero (financial) benefit. They vary between firms. An indulgent pay work mirror the connection among wages and occupation qualities. It matches laborers with various hazard inclinations with firms that can give employments that coordinate these diverse hazard inclinations.
Apathy bends uncover the exchange offs that a laborer favors among wages and level of hazard (chance thought to be an 'awful'). To give a similar utility, dangerous occupations must compensation higher wages than safe employments. The more prominent the laborer's aversion for hazard, the more prominent the pay off required for changing from a safe to an unsafe activity, and the more noteworthy the booking cost. As the pay firms bring to the table for hazardous occupations increments, less firms will extend to dangerous employment opportunities and bringing about a descending slanting interest bend as it turns out to be increasingly productive for firms to make occupations spare than to pay the higher compensation.
Suppositions of Differential Wage Theory are:
- The compensation differential is sure. Hazardous employments pay more than spare occupations.
- The balance wage differential is that of the last laborer employed (the peripheral specialist). It's anything but a proportion of the normal abhorrence for chance among laborers in the work showcase.
- Along these lines, everything except the minimal specialist are overcompensated by the market.
On the off chance that a few specialists like to work in dangerous occupations (they are eager to pay for the option to be harmed) and if the interest for such laborers is little, the market repaying differential is negative. At point P, where supply rises to request, laborers utilized in unsafe occupations acquire not as much as laborers utilized in safe employments. The outline given beneath shows the circumstance:
Isoprofit Curve:
As it is exorbitant to create well-being, a firm contribution hazard level P* can make the working environment more secure for example move left on flat pivot, just on the off chance that it diminishes compensation while keeping benefits consistent, so that the iso-benefit bend is upward slanting. Higher isoprofit bend returns lower benefit.