Crossrail 1 project is about to start in London.
This project will require an initial investment of 9.4 billion. The project will start earning cash flows from year and it will continue to year 60 which is useful life of the project.
The NPV for the project will be 7.36 which is positive. The correct answer is c.
The payback period for project is 13.04 years which is given in the option a so correct answer is a.
The internal rate of return for the project is b. 7.35 .
Based on our analytics and calculation since NPV is positive so cross rail project is beneficial. The board should consider launching this project.
Learn more at brainly.com/question/24353321
Answer:
A pay back the investors with interest I believe
I think this is a true or false question
The above statement is true.
As we can see that there are always some sort of affinity among people some have highly positive towards some and negative towards others so they will try to group up with the ones they like but this would always lead to dissatisfaction of some people in group as they will feel unfair as they are not in group they wanted but in random assignment no one has control so even if they are unsatisfied they cant blame it on others. So there are lesser differences
Answer:
the opportunity cost of going to work on saturday is $32
Explanation:
The opportunity cost of going to work on saturday is as follows:
= Income earned on saturday - psychic cost
= 4 hours × $11 - ($2 × 4 hours)
= $44 - $8
= $32
hence, the opportunity cost of going to work on saturday is $32
Answer:
The separate-entity assumption
Explanation:
The separate-entity assumption is a principal in accounting according to which the financial transactions of a business and the personal expenses of the owners is to kept separate from each other. The expenses derived solely for the business is only to be counted under the expenses of the company. Inclusion of any personal expenses of the owner or any partner of the business is prohibited under this principal.
In the given excerpt, the owner of Shady Grove Company had violated the separate-entity assumption by including the expenses of his personal items under the name of the Company.
