The number of motivation theories which the criminal justice system considers as the different type of approaches taken in an organization are:
<h3>What is Motivational Theory?</h3>
This refers to the study or theory which tries to understand the various things which drives a person to do what he does.
With this in mind, we can state that the criminal justice system considers six motivation theories as they try to find out why people act in a certain way.
Read more about motivational theory here:
brainly.com/question/6853726
The rich do not want to have to pay for the poor to use public systems. The rich in the first place rarely have the need to use public transport or public services in the first place. In there eyes do not pay for something you do not use.<span />
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
Answer:
Common wealth, province, Borough, Suburb
Explanation:
Answer: B
Explanation: B because it seems more right an that is what i think
