Answer: -
Metals are ductile instead of brittle because they have flexible bonds.
Explanation: -
Metals have a property called ductility.
It is the ability of a metal to be drawn into wires.
Metals due to greater bond flexibility are more ductile.
The most ductile metal known to man is Gold. Metallic wires find many applications in modern machinery particularly.
Usually ductility and malleability go together.
The dependent variable is plant height.
The <em>dependent variable</em> (plant height) is the <em>property that changes</em> as a result something the scientist does.
The <em>independent variable</em> is the <em>property that the scientist changes</em> systematically (the amount of CO_2) to see its effect.
The <em>number of plants</em> and the <em>types of plants</em> are <em>uncontrolled variables</em>. They may or may not affect the heights of the plants.
First, we determine the mass of each element from the data collected. We can get the mass of molybdenum Mo from the difference between the mass of crucible and molybdenum and the mass of crucible:
Mass of molybdenum = 39.52 – 38.26 = 1.26 g Mo
We can calculate for the mass of molybdenum oxide from the difference between the mass of crucible and molybdenum oxide and the mass of crucible:
Mass of molybdenum oxide = 39.84 – 38.26 = 1.58g
We can now compute for the mass of oxygen O by subtracting the mass of molybdenum from the mass of molybdenum oxide:
Mass of oxygen in molybdenum oxide = 1.58 – 1.26 = 0.32g O
To convert mass to moles, we use the molar mass of each element.
1.26 g Mo * 1 mol Mo / 95.94 g Mo = 0.0131 mol Mo
0.32 g O * 1 mol O / 15.999 g O = 0.0200 mol O
0.0131 mol is the smallest number of moles. We divide each mole value by this number:
0.0131 mol Mo / 0.0131 = 1
0.0200 mol O / 0.0131 = 1.53
Multiplying these results by 2 to get the lowest whole number ratio,
0.0131 mol Mo / 0.0131 = 1 * 2 = 2
0.0200 mol O / 0.0131 = 1.5 * 2 = 3
Thus, we can write the empirical formula as Mo2O3.
Answer:
The molecule has a bent geometry
Explanation:
Let us look again at the principles of VSEPR theory. The shape of a molecule depends on the number of electron pairs that surround the valence shell of the central atom in the molecule.
Lone pairs distort the molecular geometry away from what is expected on the basis of VSEPR theory.
The molecule described in the question has the form AEX2. Two substituents and one lone pair form three electron domains around the central atom. The expected geometry is trigonal planar but the observed molecular geometry is bent because of the lone pairs present.
Explanation:
The given data is as follows.
Now, according to Michaelis-Menten kinetics,
![V_{o} = V_{max} \times [\frac{S}{(S + Km)}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V_%7Bo%7D%20%3D%20V_%7Bmax%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5B%5Cfrac%7BS%7D%7B%28S%20%2B%20Km%29%7D%5D)
where, S = substrate concentration = 
M
Now, putting the given values into the above formula as follows.
![V_{o} = 6.8 \times 10^{-10} \mu mol/min \times [\frac{10.4 \times 10^{-6} M}{(10.4 \times 10^{-6}M + 5.2 \times 10^{-6} M)}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V_%7Bo%7D%20%3D%206.8%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-10%7D%20%5Cmu%20mol%2Fmin%20%5Ctimes%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B10.4%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-6%7D%20M%7D%7B%2810.4%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-6%7DM%20%2B%205.2%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-6%7D%20M%29%7D%5D)
= 
This means that 
would approache 
.
