1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
satela [25.4K]
3 years ago
13

I need help with number 26 plz

Mathematics
2 answers:
STatiana [176]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: BD=53

Step-by-step explanation:

Set the two equations given equal to each other because they are the same line

Yanka [14]3 years ago
4 0
This is the answer to problem 26:

You might be interested in
Work out the mean.<br> 1, 3, 3. 4. 6, 9, 9
I am Lyosha [343]
1+3+3+4+6+9+9 is 35
7 numbers so divide by 7
35/7 = 5
Mean is 5
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Genes are sections of DNA that code for a particular trait. Genes are?<br>​
Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

Genes are DNA transferred to off spring by parents

6 0
2 years ago
A+3/4=7/8. Please help solve equation using subtraction
vazorg [7]
1/8
If you can make the bottom numbers (denominator) The same that you can use subtract the top numbers like normally
7 0
3 years ago
shi x, miao w, and tchetgen tchetgen ej. (2020). multiply robust causal inference with double negative control adjustment for ca
fomenos

Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.

What is unmeasured cofounding?

  • By definition, an unmeasured confounder is a variable that is connected to both the exposed and the result and could explain the apparent observed link.
  • The validity of interpretation in observational studies is threatened by unmeasured confounding. The use of negative control group to reduce unmeasured confounding has grown in acceptance and popularity in recent years.

Although they've been utilised mostly for bias detection, negative controls have a long history in laboratory sciences and epidemiology of ruling out non-causal causes. A pair of negative control exposure and outcome variables can be utilised to non-parametrically determine the average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data that is vulnerable to uncontrolled confounding, according to a recent study by Miao and colleagues.

Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.

Learn more about unmeasured confounding here:

brainly.com/question/10863424

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
Why is gravity different on other planets?
Sliva [168]

Answer:

2--2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2--2-2-2-2--2

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLLSSSS HELPPP!! 10 POINTS!!! Suppose you have a pair of supplementary angles. One angle measures (6x+28)° and the other angle m
    8·1 answer
  • Given y=log3(x+4) what is the domain
    9·2 answers
  • Samantha is a waitress and earns a weekly paycheck of $350 plus any tips she earns throughout the week. One week, Samantha notic
    9·2 answers
  • The​ half-life of​ carbon-14 is 5600 years. If a piece of charcoal made from the wood of a tree shows only 66​% of the​ carbon-1
    6·1 answer
  • CAN SOME ONE HELP ME PLZZZ IM STRUGGLEING ON MY EDGE
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME PLEASE MAX POINTS
    14·1 answer
  • The circumference of a circle is 177 ft. Find its diameter, in feet.
    6·1 answer
  • Find the compound interest on Rs 12000 for 2years at 5% per annum
    6·1 answer
  • Riley invested $8,500 in an account paying an interest rate of 3.8% compounded daily. Assuming no deposits or withdrawals are ma
    10·1 answer
  • Amira sells balloon animals. She uses the same number of balloons for each animal she makes.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!