300
because 3 x 1 = 3 +00 = 300... make sense?
Answer:
For D I believe it would be 6
Step-by-step explanation:
I believe 6 because is you do 108÷18 you get 6 and then it would be 6/108 = 7/18 which is true.
Might not be correct and I don't know the others sorry!
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning