1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ivanzaharov [21]
3 years ago
5

Simon Leagreet, the Chairperson and CEO of L-EVA Industries, Inc., has long been the major power at L-EVA. A majority of the dir

ectors are concerned that while Mr. Leagreet has been responsible for the firm's earning above-average returns, he has been displaying a tendency toward personal extravagance at the firm's expense. In order to limit Mr. Leagreet's power, the board of directors plans to:_________.
a. elect an insider as the lead director.
b. appoint another individual as chairperson of the board of directors.
c. require Mr. Leagreet to personally certify the firm's financial reports.
d. reduce the size of the stock option package provided to Mr. Leagreet.
Social Studies
2 answers:
Anna11 [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

b. appoint another individual as chairperson of the board of directors.

Explanation:

As the statement indicates that the idea is to limit Mr. Leagreet's power who is Chairperson and CEO, the board of directors should appoint another individual as chairperson of the board of directors. This because the CEO is the person that manages an organization and has to report to the board of directors. The Chairperson is who directs the board of directors. Because of that, electing another individual as the Chairperson would allow to limit Mr. Leagreet's power as in his duty as CEO he would have to report to the Board of Directors that would be led by a different person.

viktelen [127]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

b. appoint another individual as chairperson of the board of directors.

Explanation:

By appointing another individual as chairperson of the board of directors, will essentially limits Mr. Simon Leagreets power or role, to position of CEO only, which in turn will reduce his personal extravagance at the expense of the firm, as powers and influence has been decentralized in the firm.

In other words, by electing another insider as the lead director, will have no effect on Mr. Leagreet personal extravagance, because the Lead director will still be under his executive directives.

Also, requiring Mr. Leagreet to personally certify the firm's financial report is equating to giving him more power or role to function which does not limits his personal extravagance

And lastly, reducing the size of the stock option package of Mr. Leagreet will in no way, reduce his personal extravagance at the firm's expense.

You might be interested in
HELP ASAP!!!! PLZ ANSWER IF YOU DON'T KNOW DON'T ANSWER
liq [111]
The North wanted the federal government to govern the entire country. The South wanted the states to have more power.

They also disagreed on whether or not the new territories would allow slavery or not.
5 0
3 years ago
How did anti-Semitism propaganda, such as posters, radio programs, and movies, impact Germany?
marshall27 [118]

The correct answers are

It led to riots and destruction of Jewish shops, homes, and synagogues.

It turned German citizens against Jews.

The propaganda campaign led by Adolph Hitler during the 1930's lead to German citizens despising Jewish citizens and blaming them for Germany's past economic and social problems. A lot of this propaganda came after Hitler's famous book <em>Mein Kempf. </em>After Hitler rose to political power, he used political propaganda, posters, speeches, and radio programs to reinforce his ideas of Jewish people being the source of all German problems.

4 0
3 years ago
The bureaucracy, compared to Congress, A. is more educated. B. is older. C. is much more diverse. D. is younger.
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

C. is much more diverse

Explanation:

  • The bureaucracy as a form of the government is much more diverse and open as compared to the congress.
4 0
3 years ago
Global Business Ethics. Pfizer, Inc., developed a new antibiotic called Trovan (trovafioxacinmesylate). Tests showed that inanima
Sever21 [200]

Answer:

1

The action of  Pfizer is no way near an ethical act and was a clear violation of the ethical standards.This is true because

  • As it is the company responsibility to act ethically to achieve the goals of the society by eradicating their problems and not by enhancing them hence the corporate social responsibility would not allow the company to behave inhumanly
  • The duty based ethics would also empower the corporation to care and respect humanity
  • Its is highly unethical on the part of Pfizer to conduct test on human life.if  we consider the six basic guidelines to make ethical decisions then they have done it in a highly unethical manner.The six basic guidelines would never allow any company to behave i such a manner so as to risk the human life  

Pfizer did not obey any of the above ethical standards and the conduct was clear violation of ethical standard.

2

Pfizer plc is not guilty of any ethical standard violation as it is a common practice for drug manufacturer to conduct tests on animals as well as human.And anyways the company conducted the tests on those human beings who will die with the epidermic which has already invaded the entire country of Nigeria.Hence in other to save/protect  a large number of human being the test on the few persons is ethical as it is done to protect the society at large

So we cannot say that the company had violated any ethical standard

3

In order for Pfizer to avert the consequences  of the violation then Pfizer should use the following five steps to create solution tom problem on ethical question these steps include

  • Inquiry : It is very crucial to make initial inquiry about the entire subject matter
  • Discussion: If there is a list of action generated after inquiry then discussion  on every single action should be made
  • Decision : It is highly crucial to take any decision with the consensus of all the participating candidates
  • Justification : Each decision made must have a justification for the entire process
  • Evaluation : it is highly crucial to evaluate the entire process

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why might the US eliminate a tariff?
Lady_Fox [76]
The US may eliminate a tariff because the increase of specialization and the benefits from economy scales.


Hope this helped(:
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ​dr. webb designs a research study in which neither the subjects nor the individuals who interact directly with the subjects kno
    8·2 answers
  • According to the bill hammack the engineerguy light travels down a fiber optic cable by a process known as
    14·1 answer
  • Identify the statement that correctly describes social psychology.
    10·1 answer
  • g What are the benefits and drawbacks of federalism? In other words, would American society be better off if the federal governm
    7·1 answer
  • Gerrymandering involves drawing districts more fairly based upon its ethnic and social background.
    6·2 answers
  • ASAP I only have 5 mins I will give u a Brainly crown just pleaseee
    7·2 answers
  • Confucius said that people would be harmonious if they were obedient, loyal, and honest in the following relationships: (list th
    8·2 answers
  • From which country did you belong​
    8·1 answer
  • A nurse is developing a plan of care for a 7-year-old client who has experienced early development of secondary sex characterist
    10·1 answer
  • American eagle outfitters classifies the denim jeans on the shelves at its retail locations as:_________
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!