The set of ordered pairs represents a functuon. Write a rule represents the function. (0,0),(1,6),(2,24),(3,54),(4,96)

You randomly select an integer from 0 to 19 (inclusively) and then randomly select an integer from 0 to 24 (inclusively). What

Mila [183]

Answer:

The probability of selecting 5 both times is 0.002.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that you randomly select an integer from 0 to 19 (inclusively) and then randomly select an integer from 0 to 24 (inclusively).

And we have to find the probability of selecting 5 both times.

As we know that the probability of an event is given by;

Probability = $\frac{\text{Favorable number of outcomes}}{\text{Total number of outcomes}}$

Now, here between integer from 0 to 19 (inclusively);

Number of times 5 comes = 1

Total number of integers = 20

Similarly, between integer from 0 to 24 (inclusively);

Number of times 5 comes = 1

Total number of integers = 25

So, the required probability = $\frac{1}{20}\times \frac{1}{25}$

= $\frac{1}{500}$ = 0.002

Hence, the probability of selecting 5 both times is 0.002.

5 0

3 years ago

Suppose that you and two friends go to a restaurant, which last month filled approximately 91.7 % of the orders correctly. comp

MrMuchimi

77.1% chance that all 3 orders are correct.
For three independent events to find the probability of each one occurring we multiply the probabilities together. .917*.917*.917 = .77109 or 77.1 percent chance of all three outcomes being favorable.

5 0

3 years ago

What comes next in the series 21 18 15 12

Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In the figure below, F,G,H and J are collinear. FG, GK, and HK are lone segments of equivalent length, and the measure of JHK is

ANEK [815]

The answer would be 30 degrees because points F, G, H, and J are collinear, all you would have to do is figure out /_GHK by subtracting 180 degrees from it.

Like this :

JHK = 180 degrees - 120 degrees = 60 degrees

8 0

3 years ago

Kase, an individual, purchased some property in Potomac, Maryland, for $217,000 approximately 10 years ago. Kase is approached b

Advocard [28]

The question is incomplete.

The complete question is

Kase, an individual, purchased some property in Potomac, Maryland, for $217,000 approximately 10 years ago. Kase is approached by a real estate agent representing a client who would like to exchange a parcel of land in North Carolina for Kase’s Maryland property. Kase agrees to the exchange.

What is Kase’s realized gain or loss, recognized gain or loss, and basis in the North Carolina property in each of the following alternative scenarios? (Loss amounts should be indicated by a minus sign. Leave no answer blank. Enter zero if applicable.)

a. The transaction qualifies as a like-kind exchange and the fair market value of each property is $907,500.

b. The transaction qualifies as a like-kind exchange and the fair market value of each property is $199,000.

Answer:

A. Realized gain(907500-217000)= 609,500

Recognized gain= 0

Adjustment basis in new property=217,000.

B. Realised loss ( 199000 - 217000) = 18,000

Recognized loss= 0

Adjusted basis in new property= 217000

Step-by-step explanation:

A.

Realized gain(907500-217000)= 609,500

Recognized gain= 0

Adjustment basis in new property=217,000.

Here , we find that Kase has realised gain of $ 690,500 but recognised gain of $ 0 . It is so because Kase did not receive any boot and the transaction is a like-kind exchange. Therefore, the adjusted basis in new property = $ 217,000 ( as no gain is recognised ).

B.

Realised loss ( 199000 - 217000 )= 18,000

Recognized loss= 0

Adjusted basis in new property= 217000

7 0

3 years ago