The difference between the standard cost of a product and its actual cost is called a cost variance. Therefore the statement is true.
<h3>What is the objective of variance?</h3>
Changing across all of the pieces of information in a data set, variance is a measurement of distribution. It enables us to estimate how far away a set of factors are from each other.
To describe the variation or difference between the standard cost of a product and its actual cost the use of cost variance is done. It is utilized to estimate the financial performance of any project.
Therefore, the statement is True.
Learn more about Variance, here:
brainly.com/question/16269880
#SPJ1
Answer:
$2,000
Explanation:
Usually, the landlord is required to notify the tenant if he/she plans to sell the property, but regardless of who owns the property (the original landlord or a new landlord), the contract terms are valid and must be honored by both the current landlord and the tenant.
The new owner immediately became the new landlord and he/she assumed all the responsibilities stated in the lease contract. Since the lease contract stated that the "lessor (landlord) agreed to maintain all structures on the property in good repair", the new landlord must pay for any necessary repairs.
Answer:
A. planning, scheduling, and controlling.
Explanation:
The phases of project management are -
1. Initiation
2. Planning
3. Execution - Scheduling
4. Control
5. Close
Option A is correct because the answer includes the 2nd, 3rd, and fourth phases of project management.
Option B is wrong because programming is not a phase of project management. Option C is a combination of management functions. Therefore, it is incorrect. Option D is not correct as the service project is not different from the manufacturing project. Option E is the project management technique.
Answer:
lets look at the options and find the correct one!
obviously technology is not related to this at all. so we can cut it off.
Operations is not applicable as an answer as well. it doesn't seem to fit in.
Structure and executive pay are two different things so nope! not that one!
d. people this option is a bit confusing so lets keep it for now.
e. social responsibility seems like fits in too as the government money saves these companies, the companies have a responsibility to have a fair pay towards their executives.
but as the question asks "example of an organization change attempt focused on influencing", in my view the most suitable one would be PEOPLE since the Politicians, tax payers and news media are all trying to do this by influencing people.
Explanation:
