Answer:
D.
Explanation:
all of these statements are true
The way in which consumers<u> </u><u>most benefit </u>from a perfectly competitive undifferentiated market compared to a monopolist competition is that this kind of market will produce lower prices.
An increase in the<u> number of choices</u> as well as the<u> amount of marketing</u> can be considered consumer benefits of a perfectly competitive market in that the increased competition will force companies to expand into new products and invest more towards marketing in an effort to attract consumers, thus making it easier for said consumers to find their desired product.
on the other hand, a monopoly is when a <u>single controlling entity </u>has ownership of<u> all or almost all of the producing companies for a specific product</u>, causing an absence of competition and thus eliminating the need for competitive pricing. Though the benefits mentioned before are good for consumers, the greatest benefit is in the reduction in prices caused by a competitive market, allowing much greater access to a wider variety of goods for all of the economic classes.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/10441375?referrer=searchResults
D. Hope this helps give branlist
If there were no secondary consumers, there would be an increased population ofprimary consumers. Since primary consumers are herbivores, they would be eating plant life (producers) at a much higher rate.
Answer:
The correct answer will be- False
Explanation:
In humans three types of chief cells are found, one of which is present in the stomach and thus are called gastric chief cells.
The gastric chief cells are involved in the digestion of proteins present in the food by producing pepsinogen enzymes in its inactive form which gets activated in the presence of acid produced by the parietal cells.
Since the pepsinogen is produced to digest the proteins and not to prevent the erosion caused by the acid inside the chief cells therefore, false is the correct answer.
