Answer:
Intensity of the light (first polarizer) (I₁) = 425 W/m²
Intensity of the light (second polarizer) (I₂) = 75.905 W/m²
Explanation:
Given:
Unpolarized light of intensity (I₀) = 950 W/m²
θ = 65°
Find:
a. Intensity of the light (first polarizer)
b. Intensity of the light (second polarizer)
Computation:
a. Intensity of the light (first polarizer)
Intensity of the light (first polarizer) (I₁) = I₀ / 2
Intensity of the light (first polarizer) (I₁) = 950 / 2
Intensity of the light (first polarizer) (I₁) = 425 W/m²
b. Intensity of the light (second polarizer)
Intensity of the light (second polarizer) (I₂) = (I₁)cos²θ
Intensity of the light (second polarizer) (I₂) = (425)(0.1786)
Intensity of the light (second polarizer) (I₂) = 75.905 W/m²
Answer:
The kinetic energy would decrease because it has less mass
Explanation:
A battery
Answer:
If a Gaussian surface is completely inside an electrostatic conductor, the electric field must always be zero at all points on that surface.
Explanation:
Option A is incorrect because, given this case, it is easier to calculate the field.
Option B is incorrect because, in a situation where the surface is placed inside a uniform field, option B is violated
Option C is also incorrect because it is possible to be a field from outside charges, but there will be an absence of net flux through the surface from these.
Hence, option D is the correct answer. "If a Gaussian surface is completely inside an electrostatic conductor, the electric field must always be zero at all points on that surface."
