Answer:
31%
Step-by-step explanation:
Of the 6101 students on financial aid, 1879 are graduates. This fraction is ...
1879/6101 × 100% ≈ 30.798% ≈ 31%
To solve for C, you have to get both of the numbers with a C on the same side. So, subtract the 5c from the right side onto the left side.
![8c = 5c + 21\\8c - 5c = 5c - 5c + 21\\3c = 21](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=8c%20%3D%205c%20%2B%2021%5C%5C8c%20-%205c%20%3D%205c%20-%205c%20%2B%2021%5C%5C3c%20%3D%2021)
Then, divide by 3 on each side.
![3c = 21\\3c /3 = 21/3\\c = 7](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=3c%20%3D%2021%5C%5C3c%20%2F3%20%3D%2021%2F3%5C%5Cc%20%3D%207)
So, c = 7.
Complete Question
The complete is shown on the first uploaded image
Answer:
The correct option are option 2 and option 4
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size is n = 12
The test statistics is ![t \approx 1.434](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t%20%5Capprox%201.434)
The level of significance is ![\alpha = 0.05](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Calpha%20%3D%200.05)
The rejection region is t>1.796
The null hypothesis ![H_o: \mu_d=0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=H_o%3A%20%5Cmu_d%3D0)
The alternative hypothesis is ![H_a : \mu_d >0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=H_a%20%3A%20%5Cmu_d%20%3E0)
From the given values we see that t < 1.796(i.e 1.434 < 1.796 ) which implies that t is not within the rejection region
Hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is that there is insufficient evidence to suggest that that the husbands are significantly older than the wife.
Answer:
uhh either 4/4 1 or 2/2
Step-by-step explanation:
if the words covered by the light reflection says "the shaded part", then there are 4 total pieces, which means all four are shaded.
Answer:
25
Step-by-step explanation:
4x+8+72=180
4x+80=180
180-80=100
100/4=25
x=25