Women’s peak 1RM > Men’s peak 1RM True or False

Health

1 answer:

leonid [27]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

True

Women can work at a higher percentage of 1RM (1 Rep Maximum) than men can for the same reps (11)

You might be interested in

Which of the following influences on skill-related fitness cannot be applied or changed to improve fitness levels?

Morgarella [4.7K]

The answer to this question is option A.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

4. Decision trees are organized through a series of ________.

Nutka1998 [239]

I am going with c or a plz give me brainliest

4 0

3 years ago

Which three kinds of direct pressure do you ex-<br> perience most often?

Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

Persuasion, explanations, and put-downs

5 0

4 years ago

For the past week, Li Na was very busy and slept very little. Li Na spent the entire week studying for an important exam. Li Na'

Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

poorer memory and reasoning than usual

Explanation:

According to my research on studies conducted by various neurologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question her performance was most likely affected by poorer memory and reasoning than usual, caused by lack of sleep and energy. Neurologists, believe that lack of sleep impairs a person's ability to focus and learn efficiently as well as not allowing a memory to stick in order for it to be recalled in the future.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

7 0

4 years ago

A health worker is interested in determining if omega-3 fish oil can help reduce cholesterol in adults. She obtains permission t

Dominik [7]

Answer:

Observational study
See explanation below
No

Explanation:

This is an observational study as the health worker did not conduct any experiment but instead, she observed and studied patients data and drew her inferences from the available data.
A confounding is an external variable in an experiment that can change the effect of the dependent and independent variable. They can ruin an experiment if not accounted for and suggest false correlations, and introduce bias as it is one of the sources of bias in epidemiological studies. For example, using the study above, it is said that the cholesterol reading of the group not taking omega-3 fish oil is 18 points higher than the other; a confounding variable would be like an extra independent variable unaccounted for which could influence the outcome of the study like the age of the patients, family history, diet etc. All these extra variables can influence the cholesterol level of the patients but yet were unaccounted for and if inferences are made from the observations, the correlations could be false.
Even though the 18 point difference is statistically significant, they cannot conclude that omega-3 fish oil is the cause because of the effect of confounding in experiments and the many external variables like lifestyle, diet, smoking etc. which could influence the outcome of the research that were unaccounted for

7 0

3 years ago