Answer:
William Levitt
Explanation:
William Levitt worked for his father's company Levitt and Sons and after coming back from war came up with the assembly-line techniques to help build more affordable homes for soldiers coming back from war
The statements referred by the question are:
a) It convinced the United States to dismantle its nuclear weapons.
b) It proved that a naval blockade was not an act of war.
c) It showed Cuba that communism should be stopped.
d) It brought the world dangerously close to nuclear war.
The correct statement is D. Historians agree the Missile Crisis was the closest the world got to have a nuclear war between the U.S. and USSR. Nothing before or after this came as close to be direct aggression from one of these countries against the other.
Statements A and C never happened: the U.S. has nuclear weapons until today, and Cuba didn't give up on communism.
Statement B doesn't fit the facts around the Missile Crisis. The naval blockade didn't lead to war only because the U.S. was defensive.
Answer:
Balban had several military achievements during his vizierhood, first raising the Mongol siege of Uch under Masud Shah in 1246. When the governor of Bengal, Tughral Tughan Khan, revoked the authority of Delhi in 1275, Balban first sent the governor of Awadh and then a second army, both of which met with failure.
(not sure)
Answer:
"March to Freedom" on Detroit was a demonstration of discipline.
Explanation:
"Martin Luther King" led the “March to Freedom” from Woodland to Cobo Hall. It was the march demanding equal rights and jobs just like white Americans. While they marched, they sang “We Shall Overcome” and then Martin gave the speech “I have a dream”.
It was a peaceful protest and King urged the protesters against violence. He told them that people should not show hatred towards white Americans because they are also Americans just fighting for same rights. So, when they return back to their homes in North and South, they should believe that this situation would change.
The March was successful and there was no hatred speech or violence. Thus, it was a demonstration of discipline.
<span>In Arizona v. Evans (l995), the u.s. supreme court refused to apply the exclusionary rule because:
</span>
The error was made by clerical employees of the court.
