Consider the demand equation q=20,000 p^(-1.4). if the cost of production is constant at $0.50 per unit $1.75 is the optimal price to maximize profit.
The income maximization system depends on income general sales overall fee. consequently, a firm maximizes earnings while MR = MC, that is the primary order, and the second order depends on the first order. This idea differs from wealth maximization in phrases of length for income earnings and the company's goals.
Calculation,
The demand equation q=20,000 p^(-1.4)
The production constant is $0.50
maximum profit= $1.75
The choicest charge is that charge point at which the total earnings of the seller are maximized. while the rate is just too low the vendor is shifting a big quantity of devices but income is the best possible combination of income. Examples of income maximizations like this encompass: discovering less expensive raw materials than those presently used. discover a provider that gives better charges for inventory purchases. locate product resources with decreased delivery prices. lessen labor expenses.
Learn more about The optimal price here:-brainly.com/question/28332226
#SPJ4
Answer:
B.0.83
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
Total machines Available = 600
Number of machines used in a given year = 500
So by considering the above information, the utilization of spinning machines is
Utilization = Resource used ÷Resource available
= 500 ÷ 600
= 0.83
By dividing the resources used with the resources available we can get the utilization and the same is applied
Answer: $283,140
Explanation:
Total Cost = Materials cost + Conversion cost
Conversion cost per unit = (Direct labor + Factory overhead ) / Equivalent units of production
= (142,300 + 57,200)/ ( 18,000 + (2,000 * 30%))
= 199,500/ 18,600
= $10.73 per unit
Direct material cost is $5 per unit from the question.
Total cost of the 18,000 units;
= (18,000 * 5) + (18,000 * 10.73)
= $283,140
Answer:
Punitive damages are those harms that surpass basic pay and are granted with an expectation to rebuff the respondent. The essential target of reformatory harm isn't to remunerate the oppressed party however to rebuff the gathering that hosts irritated or wronged the bothered get-together.
Granting punitive damages for penetrate of agreement can conceivably hurt the general public. This is on the grounds that numerous penetrates of agreement can be because of conduct of the culpable party which is neither intentional nor careless. Reformatory harms should just be restricted and material to tort cases and should just be utilized to rebuff those bad behaviors that are conscious and foolish. Anyway utilizing correctional activities to rebuff somebody who has penetrated an agreement because of specific occasions or circumstances that were not in his control will be crooked and uncalled for.
Punitive damages are semi criminal in nature and ordering and clubbing all break of agreement (despite the fact that not purposeful or not having components of dishonesty, malevolence or wanton) as semi criminal in nature will be in opposition to open arrangement and will hurt the general public.
Additionally i would calculate it first and then divide it :) and don't forget to use pi
