Inductive arguments aim to show not that the conclusion must be true but rather that it is likely true. ... No inductive argument aims to prove its conclusion with certainty. Mathematical arguments are a type of deductive argument. Cause-and-effect reasoning is a type of deductive argument. So false
All of above
As they need all sides of the spectrum and who is fit for the job.
#bluelivesmatter
Answer:
Judicial independence is the concept that the judiciary should be independent from the other branches of government. That is, courts should not be subject to improper influence from the other branches of government or from private or partisan interests.
Explanation:
Answer:
Fair use
Explanation:
pls mark me as brainlest pls
Answer: Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty
Explanation:
Intermediate sanctions do not involve the person going to prison but they are quite intrusive as they include (but are not limited to): intensive supervision and electronic monitoring. Most people believe they should be used as punishment for nonviolent <u>crime</u>.
The keyword above is ''crime''. If there is a lack of evidence that a person committed a crime then they are presumed innocent which means they did not commit the crime in question and so do not qualify for intermediate sanctions.
