Based on writing standards, the inquiry letter for purchase should begin with the sender's address and be written like a formal letter.
<h3>Structures of Letter of Inquiry.</h3>
- The sender's address should be written at the beginning of the letter, followed by the receiver's address.
- The letter must contain all the elements of the enquiring item, including their quantities.
- There must be the date and address of the receiver included.
- The letter's subject must be written clearly before the letter's content.
- Ensure you provide the expected salutation at the beginning of the letter.
- Write clearly and straightforward.
- Provide reasons and inquiry descriptions.
- Add your signature, name, and designation at the end of the letter.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are specific ways to write a good inquiry letter.
Learn more about Inquiry Letter here: brainly.com/question/4208084
Answer:
Change in Assets is $127,500
Explanation:
The accounting equation for a corporation is:
Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders' Equity
⇒ Liabilities = Assets - Stockholders' Equity
= $285,000 - $130,500
= $154,500
At the end of years,
- Liabilities amount = Liabilities in the beginning + Change in liabilities = $154,500+ $90,000 = $244,500
- Stockholder's equity amount = Stockholder's equity + Change in stockholder's equity = $130,500 + $37,500 = $168,000
The assets at the end of year = $168,000 + $244,500 = $412,500
Change in Assets = $412,500 - $285,000 = $127,500
Shorter answer:
Change in Assets = Change in Liabilities + Change in Stockholders' Equity
= $90,000 + $37,500 = $127,500
I think it is c I’m not sure
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
