All categories

3 years ago

Gordon types 1,972 words in 29 minutes Gordon types _______ words per minute PLSSS HELPP ME

Mathematics

1 answer:

Xelga [282]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

68 words

Step-by-step explanation:

To find how many words Gordon types per minute :

1972 ÷ 29 = 68 #

You might be interested in

Question 2 of 5

AlekseyPX

Given:

The different recursive formulae.

To find:

The explicit formulae for the given recursive formulae.

Solution:

The recursive formula of an arithmetic sequence is $f(n)=f(n-1)+d, f(1)=a,n\geq 2$ and the explicit formula is $f(n)=a+(n-1)d$ , where a is the first term and d is the common difference.

The recursive formula of a geometric sequence is $f(n)=rf(n-1), f(1)=a,n\geq 2$ and the explicit formula is $f(n)=ar^{n-1}$ , where a is the first term and r is the common ratio.

The first recursive formula is:

$f(1)=5$

$f(n)=f(n-1)+5$ for $n\geq 2$ .

It is the recursive formula of an arithmetic sequence with first term 5 and common difference 5. So, the explicit formula for this recursive formula is:

$f(n)=5+(n-1)(5)$

$f(n)=5+5(n-1)$

Therefore, the correct option is A, i.e., $f(n)=5+5(n-1)$ .

The second recursive formula is:

$f(1)=5$

$f(n)=3f(n-1)$ for $n\geq 2$ .

It is the recursive formula of a geometric sequence with first term 5 and common ratio 3. So, the explicit formula for this recursive formula is:

$f(n)=5(3)^{n-1}$

Therefore, the correct option is F, i.e., $f(n)=5(3)^{n-1}$ .

The third recursive formula is:

$f(1)=5$

$f(n)=f(n-1)+3$ for $n\geq 2$ .

It is the recursive formula of an arithmetic sequence with first term 5 and common difference 3. So, the explicit formula for this recursive formula is:

$f(n)=5+(n-1)(3)$

$f(n)=5+3(n-1)$

Therefore, the correct option is D, i.e., $f(n)=5+3(n-1)$ .

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A market research team thinks that their new ad campaign is better than their old one. They used to be able to sell to 50% of th

andreev551 [17]

Answer:

a. The test statistic is 2 and we conclude that the new ad campaign is not signficantly better.

Step-by-step explanation:

They used to be able to sell to 50% of those who saw their ads. Test if the new campaign is better.

At the null hypothesis, we test is it is the same, that is, the proportion is the same.

$H_0: p = 0.5$

At the alternate hypothesis, we test if it is significantly better, that is, the proportion is above 50%.

$H_1: p > 0.5$

The test statistic is:

$z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$

In which X is the sample mean, $\mu$ is the value tested at the null hypothesis, $\sigma$ is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0.5 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that $\mu = 0.5, \sigma = \sqrt{0.5*0.5} = 0.5$

They take a random sample of 100 potential buyers and find that they convinced 60 of these people to buy their product.

This means that $n = 100, X = \frac{60}{100} = 0.6$

Test statistic:

$z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$

$z = \frac{0.6 - 0.5}{\frac{0.5}{\sqrt{100}}}$

$z = 2$

The test statistic is 2.

P-value of the test and decision:

The p-value of the test is the probability of finding a sample proportion above 0.6, which is 1 subtracted the by p-value of z = 2.

Looking at the z-table, z = 2 has a p-value of 0.9772.

1 - 0.9772 = 0.0228.

The p-value of the test is 0.0228 > 0.01, which means that we cannot conclude that the new ad campaign is signficantly better, so the correct answer is given by option A.

5 0

3 years ago

The box plot on this page shows the total amount of time, in minutes, the students of a class surf the Internet every day:

maxonik [38]

Answer:

It would be Part B

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help me with this math problem, urgent please

Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

(X+2)(v-5)

Step-by-step explanation:

first, group and factor out the greatest common factor and combine to get (x+2)(v-5)

4 0

3 years ago

Engineers measure angles in gradients, which are smaller than degrees. The table shows the conversion of some angle measures in

Schach [20]

Answer:

1.11

Step-by-step explanation:

edgenuity

5 0

3 years ago