Stuck on the same thing, tried reviewing and reviewing but now I’ll just try finding the answer key
According to sources, the most probable answer to this query is that thee results seems to support a .05 probability. Meaning, this supports the hypothesis' claim. Thank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.
Answer:
b. Subtracting the base period amount from the analysis period amount, dividing the result by the base period amount, then multiplying that amount by 100%
Step-by-step explanation:
A percentage change can be computed from ...
((new amount) -(old amount))/(old amount) × 100%
This best matches the description of choice B.
_____
<em>Comment on the answer</em>
The formula offered in the question will show the "percent change" from 100 to 103 as 3. It is not 3; rather, it is 3%. The final multiplication must be by 100% in order to arrive at the proper number.
Answer:
30+4+0.7+0.05
Step-by-step explanation:
Because the expanded form is added the number.
3=30
4=4.
7=0.7
and 5=0.05 so all together is 30+4+0.7+0.05
Answer:
$265.65
Step-by-step explanation:
Given :
WACC: 9.00%
Year 0 1 2 3 Cash flows (-$1,000) $500 $500 $500
The NPV is calculated thus :
Initial cashflow + Σ additional cash flows / (1 + r)
Rate, r = 9% = 0.09
(1 + r) = (1 + 0.09) = 1.09
NPV = - 1000 + (500 / (1.09)¹ + (500 / 1.09)² + (500 / (1.09)³
NPV = - 1000 + 458.71559 + 420.83999 + 386.09174
NPV = 265.64732
NPV = 265.65 (2 DECIMAL PLACES)
