Depends on the incident.
You can apply it to people doing nothing in a serious situation, and I highly doubt people would come forward if this effect were enacted. The way it works is we become so desensitized to such actions we don't feel it is important to do anything about it or report it.
Answer:
The Acquiantance is the one at fault in the issue not the attorney in the deceased case(estate)
Explanation: The attorney advised the acquaintance that the attorney did not have experience and was too busy to do the work necessary to become competent. The attorney offered to refer acquaintance to another lawyer who regularly practiced in the field and advised the acquaintance that he should see another lawyer promptly because there might be deadlines he should follow as the executor. The acquaintance did not contact another lawyer until eight months after meeting with the attorney. So the attorney is not subject to any civil liability.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The actions that the Qin Dynasty would take against a person who wrote a book with their own opinions, about how they did not agree with the government were lethal.
Yes, during the Qin Dynasty in China, there was no freedom of speech or freedom of the press, or something similar. Quite the opposite.
Emperors during the Qin Dynasty were dictators and ruled an absolutists form of government. That is why they were the Emperors.
If someone expressed a critic or opposition against teh Emperor, he could be killed immediately. As simple as that. The Emperor was the absolute ruler and his word was the law.
The correct answer is Personalize your ideas
Explanation:
An example is the act or action of taking an existing fact to explain a situation. An example may also be what can or should be imitated or copied, a model.
The Japanese constitution has over 40 articles that give individual rights and protection to its citizens. The constitution was created in 1947 after Japan lost World War II. The constitution set forth a new basis of government, with the emperor being used for symbolic/ceremonial purposes and giving more political power the Japanese Diet (legislative body) and prime minister.
