It is false, because the law is based on core ideas of ethics, actually. In common law, cases are determined with the help of the past decisions. Those decisions are also based on past decisions and so on. It shows that timeline doesn't matter; what matters is just the rules and principles of law.
D is the correct answer!!
Answer:A slave is property, bound to work as his/her owner sees fit. A slave has no legally protected rights of ownership. Some slaves in some sense ‘owned’ property, or even money, but this was always at the owner’s discretion, and legally it all belonged to the owner really.
Serfdom, on the other hand, was an implicit contractual relationship. The serf owed both labour and rent, usually in kind — serfdom is typical of an economy with little use of money. In return, the lord owed protection and justice. These were rough times, and a common labourer without a lord would not be able to prevent marauders seizing his land.
I hope I helped and plz mark me as brainlyest
International trade with free markets encourages the overthrow of tariffs for the free movement of goods and services between countries. According to Trade Theories, countries have peculiar characteristics that give them relative or absolute advantages. Thus, a country can specialize in a commodity and export it and import other commodities.
It is also important to emphasize that countries seek to export more than import, ie to increase their surplus in the trade balance. If a country exports more than it imports, more money gets.
The dude is so inspiring. He was the leader of the civil rights movement, and he used non violent acts to spread awareness about discrimination. He is a legend. There are some awesome articles online about him, and you will be able to find so may things about him.
