Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
La ley de refracción
Explanation:
La ley de refracción, o la ley de Snell, predice el ángulo en el que un rayo de luz se doblará o refractará, a medida que pase de un medio a otro.
Answer: Freedom of speech
Explanation:
Answer:Court Structure
Explanation:The Constitution and laws of each state establish the state courts. A court of last resort, often known as a Supreme Court, is usually the highest court. ... Below these appeals courts are the state trial courts. Some are referred to as Circuit or District Courts.
