Answer:
The correct answer will be Option A (unlimited).
Explanation:
- The potential loss which always relies on something like a potential occurrence happening or otherwise not happening. One such loss to such a writer's exposed put option on either a stock seems to be indefinite or unlimited.
- Unless the loss becomes probable as well as the sum could be calculated, the damage including responsibility must be reported with either the journal entry.
Other available scenarios aren't connected to the situation in question. So alternative A, therefore, the perfect solution.
The crowding-out effect implies that restrictive fiscal policy will reduce real interest rates.
<u>Option: D</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The crowding out effect is the circumstances where greater interest rates consequences gives output of a decline in private investment expenditure so as to dampen the initial rise in overall investment expenditure. Authorities often embraces a restrictive fiscal-policy approach and raises spending to stimulate economic activity. This contributes to interest-rate rises. Higher interest rates have a impact on private investment choices. A high magnitude of the crowding-out impact can also result in lower economic revenue.
Answer:
the allocated direct manufacturing overhead costs of Job 56 is $25
Explanation:
Overheads in manufacturing process are allocated to jobs or products using cost drivers or surrogates.
<em><u>First Step : Determine the Pre-determined Overhead rate</u></em>
Pre-determined Overhead rate = Budgeted Overheads / Budgeted Activity
= $2,000 / 800
= $ 2.50 per labor hour
<em><u>Step 2 : Determined the Amount of Overhead allocated to Job 56 based on labor hours utilised</u></em>
Overhead for Job 56 = Pre-determined Overhead rate × Hours Used
= $ 2.50 × 10
= $25
Usually, this will cause a price deduction to get rid of available products..? plse, dbl..chk
