Answer:
This will lead to overestimation of CPI and inflation.
Explanation:
Suppose consumers buy two types of meat, beef, and pork. If the price of pork remains the same while the price of beef increases, the consumers will prefer the cheaper substitute. As a result, the demand for pork will increase and the demand for beef will decline.
If the Bureau of Labor Statistics does not include this substitution in the CPI calculation, it will cause the CPI to increase as the price of beef is increasing. But in reality, consumer spending has not increased as they are purchasing more of the cheaper substitute.
This will lead to the overestimation of both CPI as well as the inflation rate.
Answer:
The civil court filing must be dismissed because of the constitutional right against double jeopardy.
Explanation:
Double jeopardy is the legal concept that protects a person from being tried again for the same or similar charge following his aquittal or conviction.
Fred Arden has been tried in criminal court and found innocent. Shawn is trying to sue him again for the same act in civil court.
This is against the rule of double jeopardy.
Answer is the threat of substitute products or services.
Rivalry among the existing competitors was not a significant factor in the BlackBerry's downfall because they were not able to produce any form of alternative to the iPhone, and the users switched from the BlackBerry phones to the iPhones. The danger of replacement products is one of the Porter's five factors, and it indicates that there are alternative items that are likely to steal the company's market share. The downfall of the BlackBerry was caused by the substitute product in the shape of the iPhone.
All of the other allegations are untrue because there were no new entrants and the suppliers threatened because they were unable to upgrade their product.
Therefore, (B) Threat of substitute products or services is the correct answer is the correct answer.
To know more about porter five forces analysis click here:
brainly.com/question/15059432
#SPJ4
Answer:
The nominal wage in 2003 = $15.22
The nominal wage in 2004 = $15.565
Explanation:
Inflation = [ ( CPI of 2003 - CPI of base year ) ÷ CPI of Base year ] × 100
= [ ( 184 - 100 ) ÷ 100 ] × 100
= 84%
Therefore,
The wage will increase by this inflation to be nominal
= 8.28 × (1.84)
= $15.23
Similarly
Inflation = [ ( CPI of 2004 - CPI of base year ) ÷ CPI of Base year ] × 100
= [ ( 188.9 - 100 ) ÷ 100 ] × 100
= 88.9%
Therefore,
The wage will increase by this inflation to be nominal
= 8.24 × (1.889)
= $15.565
Hence,
The nominal wage in 2003 = $15.22
The nominal wage in 2004 = $15.565
The system described above refers to the Fixed Exchange Rate System.
<h3>What is the fixed exchange rate system?</h3>
The fixed exchange rate system is a term that refers to the exchange regime of a monetary unit whose value is adjusted according to the value of another reference currency such as the Dollar or the Euro.
According to the above, the currencies of different countries gain or lose value according to their change with respect to the reference currencies.
This system has become widespread in the world with the aim of facilitating trade and investment between countries with the reference currencies.
Learn more about currency in: brainly.com/question/13684639