Answer:
I am writing my paragraph as a federalist .
Explanation:
As a federalist, I think that building a big national administration wasn't just feasible, but also necessary, in order to “generate a more cohesive society” through strengthening interstate ties. Until this moment, it was widely assumed that a republic could only operate effectively if it was tiny and regional. I disputed this view, claiming that a powerful national democracy will better protect person's individual freedoms.
The federalists also desired to protect the regions' sovereignty or organisation. They proposed a national govt with defined, delegated authorities to do this. The individuals as well as the regions would be in charge of anything not assigned to the central government.
I believe it’s B from what i can read
if it’s not i’m sorry
Answer:
José and Erin demonstrate <em>economic inequality.</em>
Explanation:
In a society there must have same opportunities for all citizens. Nevertheless economic background and the distribution of goods may be perpetuators of economic inequality, for they determine in most cases the opportunities people have and of course their wealth and income in the future, and therefore directly affect development, with some exceptions, be it individual, regional or national.
Economists have stand out for this, saying that if we want to develop an individual, a region or a nation, we must pay attention to two main elements: distribution of wealth and distribution of income, both to measure <em>economic inequality</em>, that means: <em>the disparity in the distribution of goods and income</em>, and with this emphasize that for the economic improvement of a region, an individual or a country there must be special help for those who don't have inherit wealth because those are most likely to earn less and have lower incomes and thus less opportunities than the ones that come from better or richer backgrounds.
In this case, José and Erin both work hard but their backgrounds are radically different. José have inherited properties, which allow him to make more money than Erin, that has no heritage but to support her elderly mother with a federal minimum wage, this leave her with few opportunities to develop. Therefore they demonstrate economic inequality.
<u><em>This is not a case of gender gap </em></u>for the emphasis is not that Erin is a women but that Erin has a federal minimum wage and doesn't have inherited properties, in contrast with José, that he does, and therefore they have different places and opportunities in society, <em>thus is a demonstration of economic inequality not a gender gap case.</em>