Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
For the null hypothesis,
µ = 60
For the alternative hypothesis,
h1: µ < 60
This is a left tailed test
Since the population standard deviation is not given, the distribution is a student's t.
Since n = 100,
Degrees of freedom, df = n - 1 = 100 - 1 = 99
t = (x - µ)/(s/√n)
Where
x = sample mean = 52
µ = population mean = 60
s = samples standard deviation = 22
t = (52 - 60)/(22/√100) = - 3.64
We would determine the p value using the t test calculator. It becomes
p = 0.00023
We would reject the null hypothesis if α = 0.05 > 0.00023
This question includes some misspelled words; here is the correct question:
Which point of view is most likely to be unreliable in a story?
All points of view in a story are equally reliable.
The first person narrator is most likely to be unreliable.
All points of view in a story are equally unreliable.
The third-person point of view is most likely to be unreliable.
The correct answer is The first-person narrator is most likely to be unreliable.
Explanation:
In a narrative text, an unreliable narrator implies the narrator lies on purpose to the reader, or his/her version of the story is not completely accurate. This feature of narration occurs mainly if the story, novel, etc. includes a first-person narrator. This is because in a first-person narrator, the thoughts, feelings, and point of view of one of the characters prevail, and this causes the events told are subjective and therefore more likely to be inaccurate. Also, this does not occur if there is a third-person narrator because in this case the narrator acts as an observer and this makes it more objective.
Answer:
x ≥ 12
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: subtract 2 from both sides
Now you have; -3/4 x ≤ -9
Step 2: divide both sides by -3/4
Now you have x ≥ 12
(when dividing an inequality by a negative you have to flip the sign)
Therefore the answer is x ≥ 12
165 is answer we also use a formula
5 ( n/2(2a + ( n-1)d)
in that n=6 ,a=3 , d= 1
