Step-by-step explanation:
I am not sure what your problem here is.
you understand the inequality signs ?
anyway, to get
6×f(-2) + 3×g(1)
we can calculate every part of the expression separately, and then combine all the results into one final result.
f(-2)
we look at the definition.
into what category is -2 falling ? the one with x<-2, or the one with x>=-2 ?
is -2 < -2 ? no.
is -2 >= -2 ? yes, because -2 = -2. therefore, it is also >= -2.
so, we have to use
1/3 x³
for x = -2 that is
1/3 × (-2)³ = 1/3 × -8 = -8/3
g(1)
again, we look at the definition.
into what category is 1 falling ? the one with x > 2 ? or the one with x <= 1 ?
is 1 > 2 ? no.
is 1 <= 1 ? yes, because 1=1. therefore it is also <= 1.
so we have to use
2×|x - 1| + 3
for x = 1 we get
2×0 + 3 = 3
6×f(-2) = 6 × -8/3 = 2× -8 = -16
3×g(1) = 3× 3 = 9
and so in total we get
6×f(-2) + 3×g(1) = -16 + 9 = -7
The correct product should have been:
<span>(–4x + 9)2 = </span>(-4x)2 + 2(-4x)(9) + 9^2 = 16x6 - 72x +81
The result is a trinomial and not a binomial nor a difference of two squares.
So, the answer is:
C = Kylie did not understand that this is a perfect square trinomial, and she did not determine the product correctly.
Answer:
42 is the smallest of the 4 numbers.
Step-by-step explanation:
The 4 consecutive integers that total 174 are 42,43,44, and 45. Therefore, 42 is the smallest out of all 4 integers.
