All categories

3 years ago

Lol help meeeeee :((((((((((((((((((((

Mathematics

2 answers:

Sliva [168]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The choice three;

$b = \frac{2A}{h}$

Step-by-step explanation:

$\frac{1}{2} bh = A \\ b = A \div ( \frac{1}{2} h) \\ b = A \times ( \frac{2}{h} ) \\ \\ b = \frac{2A}{h}$

katrin [286]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

I think the answer is the third

thirdone

Step-by-step explanation:

1/2 bh = A

bh = 2A (1/2 move to the other side and multiply 2 by A)

b = 2A/h (h move to the other side and divide 2A by h)

Hope you can understand ittttt^^

You might be interested in

Please help with math homework

frutty [35]

Answer:

240

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Chang works as a tutor for $11 an hour and as a waiter for $13 an hour. This month, he worked a combined total of 90 hours at hi

zlopas [31]

Can you show more information please? I need more.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Karen currently has an account balance of $7,062.25. She opened the account 17 years ago with a deposit of $2,640.95. If the int

Setler79 [48]

The interest rate is 0.4833333%

5 0

3 years ago

Estimate the solution to the equation 3.1g = 20.9 to the nearest whole number. about 7 about 8 about 10 about 5

lubasha [3.4K]

Divide both sides by 3.1 and find g = 20.9/3.1 ≈ 6.7 ≈ 7.
You can estimate this without a calculator by saying 20.9 ≈ 21 and 3.1≈3, then 21/3=7.

In general, be careful with rounding before a calculation, because the rounding errors can be enlarged, messing up the accuracy of your answer. It's best to round only at the end.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A sample of 900900 computer chips revealed that 66f% of the chips fail in the first 10001000 hours of their use. The company's p

Alik [6]

Answer:

No, there is not enough evidence at the 0.02 level to support the manager's claim.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the company's promotional literature states that 68% of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. Also, a sample of 900 computer chips revealed that 66% of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use.

And the quality control manager wants to test the claim that the actual percentage that fail is different from the stated percentage, i.e;

Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : p = 0.68 {means that the actual percentage that fail is same as the stated percentage}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_1$ : p 0.68 {means that the actual percentage that fail is different from the stated percentage}

The test statistics we will use here is;

T.S. = $\frac{\hat p -p}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1- \hat p)}{n} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, p = actual percentage of chip fail = 0.68

$\hat p$ = percentage of chip failed in a sample of 900 chips = 0.66

n = sample size = 900

So, Test statistics = $\frac{0.66 -0.68}{\sqrt{\frac{0.66(1- 0.66)}{900} } }$

= -1.267

Now, at 0.02 significance level, the z table gives critical value of -2.3263 to 2.3263. Since our test statistics lie in the range of critical values which means it doesn't lie in the rejection region, so we have sufficient evidence to accept null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the actual percentage that fail is same as the stated percentage and the manager's claim is not supported.

5 0

4 years ago