Answer:
3579.6
Step-by-step explanation:
First, write out the equation used to find the volume of a cylinder and place the values in place of the variables. The equation is *h where r is the radius and h is the height. When we place the values of the variables into the equation we get:
*11.4. Next, square 10 to get 100. This would give you 3.14*100*11.4. When you multiply this together you get 314 times 11.4 which gives you 3579.6 ft cubed.
Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
