Hello there! Slope is rise/run. The formula for finding slope is y2 - y1/ x2 - x1, meaning that you subtract the first x and y-coordinates from the second x and y-coordinates. We'll use the points (0, 3) and (3, 2) for this case. Plug in the values into the formula to get this:
2 - 3 / 3 - 0
Subtract the values in order to get -1/3. There. The slope of the line is -1/3.
Answer:
(3, -4)
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct equation is:
From the list of given points, we have to identify which point lies on the graph. This can be done by using the value of x-coordinates from the given points and see if they result in the corresponding y-coordinate:
For point (1, 4)
, This is not equal to 4, so it does not lie on the graph of given function.
For point (3, -4)
, The answer ans corresponding y-coordinate are the same. This means, (3, -4) point lies on the graph of given function.
Likewise, checking for 3rd and 4th point we find out that they do not lie on the graph.
So the correct answer is (3, -4)
Answer:
The correct answer for this equational ratio is x = 5
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to calculate for x, we must create the necessary ratios
Cross multiply to get
900 - 100x = 80x
900 = 180x
x = 5
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
sin 30+tan²(60)+sec²(45)
=1/2+ (√3)^2+(√2)²
=1/2+3+2
=5 1/2
=5.5
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The pediatrician said that the z-score for the boy's height, relative to other 2-year-olds in the country, was 1.59
He explains to the parents of the boy, that the extreme 5% of cases often require special attention.
(A) Does this child fall into that group?
Yes, this child falls into that group. He is among the extreme 5% of cases at the tail of the distribution.
(B) What do you need to assume about the heights of 2-year-olds, in order to find your answer to part (A)?
Assume that the distribution of heights is skewed, the heights are independent of one another, and the number of heights is very large.
